Skip to main content
S
Sola25643498czj9
Participating Frequently
August 16, 2022
Question

Hi folks, any clues about why this image is rejected?

  • August 16, 2022
  • 4 replies
  • 382 views

Is it that stylistically it looks to handmade? Lines aren't all perfect etc? That's as good as I can get it

This topic has been closed for replies.

4 replies

Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Nancy OSheaCommunity Expert
Community Expert
August 16, 2022

It's missing details.  Adobe Stock Customers expect illustrations to be sharp, crisp and clear.  Did you submit this as bitmap or vector image?

 

Read these links:

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
Jill_C
Community Expert
Jill_CCommunity Expert
Community Expert
August 16, 2022

As George indicated, it does appear to be soft. There also seems to be vignetting in the corners.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
S
Sola25643498czj9Author
Participating Frequently
August 17, 2022

yes your right this one did come out little softer than my others 😕😕 I think that must be the main thing. There are thousands of images with some vignetting as a creative choice on adobe stock though from what i have seen. I think so anyway!

Jill_C
Community Expert
Jill_CCommunity Expert
Community Expert
August 18, 2022

This Help page specifically states that vignettes must not be added. 

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/editing-dos-and-dont.html

 

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
    George_F
    Community Expert
    George_FCommunity Expert
    Community Expert
    August 16, 2022

    I found this to be underexposed when ai looked at the histogram on it, and it does have some pretty dark areas.  The details looked pretty soft when I zoom in on them.  The white spots in the sky look odd and out of place to me. No know this is a render, but are those a few dust spots in the sky?

    George F, Photographer & Forum Volunteer
    S
    Sola25643498czj9Author
    Participating Frequently
    August 17, 2022

    Hi thanks for your feedback.Yeah it could be sharper I will work on that. It doesn't look under exposed to me personally - it looks pleasantly contrasty - but perhaps that is the subjectivity of a human over AI. As an Illustration I am surprised it has been rejected cos I think it looks really cool haha. But I will work on sharpening things up. Thanks again

    George_F
    Community Expert
    George_FCommunity Expert
    Community Expert
    August 17, 2022

    You're aren't wrong, I think it looks cool too!  But from a technical perspective it has some hurdles to get over before it'll get accepted.

     

    Here is a screenshot of the histogram in Lightroom which clearly shows underexposure.  Those blue blurbs in the photo show areas where it is pure black without any information.  No matter how much I pulled up the exposure, there wasn't any information to be recovered in some of those areas.

    If you haven't read through this already, I think Adobe Do's and Don'ts for selecting and editing photos has several lines that apply to this photo.

     



    I sincerely wish you good luck!

     

    George F, Photographer & Forum Volunteer
    S
    Sola25643498czj9Author
    Participating Frequently
    August 16, 2022

    p.s. rejection was for quality issues, but hoping for some more specific feedback. Thanks

    Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
    Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices