I have these high quality images that were rejected for "Quality Issues". Any advice? They're super sharp, hires, professional looking… This has happened with a bunch of my images, so I can’t quite figure it out. Thanks!
I have these high quality images that were rejected for "Quality Issues". Any advice? They're super sharp, hires, professional looking… This has happened with a bunch of my images, so I can’t quite figure it out. Thanks!
I have these high quality images that were rejected for "Quality Issues". Any advice? They're super sharp, hires, professional looking… This has happened with a bunch of my images, so I can’t quite figure it out.
High resolution is probably making the weaknesses easier to see, not proving the files are high quality.
Copy space only helps after the subject looks commercially usable. In these sets, hard side light creates heavy shadows, the pink/turquoise backgrounds contaminate the food color, and several crops make the subject feel accidental. For food, buyers need appetizing texture and controlled highlights.
Take one frame and rebuild it: diffuse the light, neutralize the color cast, clean crumbs and edges, and leave intentional space around the food. Then judge it at thumbnail size first. If it does not look appetizing before zooming in, more pixels will not rescue it.
I think the composition could be improved. There is a problem as well with the lighting - it’s causing harsh shadows; the background is also throwing the white balance off (in my view). So ‘high quality’ in this case just may be subjective.
Yeah but in the home made bread category there is not one single studio minimal photography style shot with copy space… the rejection makes no sense to me.