Known Participant

Question

i think they misunderstood about my photos

Forum|Forum|2 years ago
January 16, 2024
5 replies
3312 views

my photos are strange, because they're taken in a specific way.

i mean when you look at them you think they are generate with AI but it's NOT.

i mean i can accept the issues about guality and stuff like that but not that they were fixed by AI.

if you could help me it will be my pleasure. here is some of my works for example :

This topic has been closed for replies.

Nancy OShea

Community Expert

One final thought. Artwork should speak for itself and convey a clear mood or message. It should not need explanation from the artist. If Reviewers can't understand it, neither will customers. 🤔 🤔

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert

Abambo

Community Expert

If Reviewers can't understand it

By @Nancy OShea

Reviewers don't care, mostly. There only "appreciation" is "valuable for stock or not (AESTHETIC OR COMMERCIAL APPEAL OF IMAGE). The rest are provable facts.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

A

Ashk34836948Author

Known Participant

One final thought. Artwork should speak for itself and convey a clear mood or message. It should not need explanation from the artist. If Reviewers can't understand it, neither will customers.

If Reviewers can't understand it

By @Nancy OShea
Reviewers don't care, mostly. There only "appreciation" is "valuable for stock or not (AESTHETIC OR COMMERCIAL APPEAL OF IMAGE). The rest are provable facts.

By @Abambo

i want this for both of you.

art is like a language, or i dont know. A WAY FOR COMMUNICATE. and if someone talk to you and you can't understand it, the words or the meaning behind that words, you just say : he doesn't even talk or... you know?

i know art is not just talking, but they are very close.

in this situation, my art is like a mute homeless.

Big Heart.

Abambo

Community Expert

I think, according what you say, that the assets got refused because of Non-Compliant image.

It does not mean that the moderators think that the asset is generative AI. They are just giving 3 reasons, and reason number 3 is yours.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

A

Ashk34836948Author

Known Participant

naa that was the quality issues and i get my answer, thank you. BIG HEART.

Abambo

Community Expert

So why did you think that they thought they were AI? Never assume what others think, just because you think they think…

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Jill_C

Community Expert

You didn't indicate the rejection reason. I assume they were rejected for quality issues, because they demonstrate the types of issues - noise, moire, blur - that photographers actively avoid. To say that the effects were intentional will not convince any Moderator to accept them anyway. Beyond the quality issues, I think the images lack commercial appeal. I can't imagine how a Buyer would want to use them in a design.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

A

Ashk34836948Author

Known Participant

you are right, i get my answer, Thank you ( heart )

Nancy OShea

Community Expert

I think you're missing the whole point of Adobe Stock. It's not an art gallery or photography contest. It's a Stock assets business that connects talented contributors with global customers.

Stock customers expect the highest technical & visual quality on a variety of subjects for use in commercial projects -- i.e. posters, t-shirts, tote bags, billboard ads, magazines, videos, printed & digital marketing, etc.. Give customers what they want and you'll succeed here. Subjects of interest include:

Aging,
Animals & wildlife,
Beauty & cosmetics,
Banking & finance,
Climate change,
Computers & technology,
Construction,
Cultural diversity,
Drone footage,
Education & learning,
Entertainment, dance,
Environment & climate change,
Fantasy & Sci-Fi,
Fitness & exercise,
Food, drink, nutrition,
Holidays,
Home & office,
Martial arts,
Medicine & medical technology,
Mental health,
Personal relationships,
Poverty & homelessness,
Real people in social settings,
Science & math,
Sports,
Travel,
Yoga, meditation, religion.

Avoid submitting low % sellers: e.g. abstract backgrounds, sunsets, clouds, plants, flowers & pets.

Carefully read your Stock Contributor User Guide for more tips.

Hope that helps. Good luck.

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert

A

Ashk34836948Author

Known Participant

thank you

George_F

Community Expert

I'm not exactly sure what your rejection reason was, but if it was for quality issues then I think they were rightfully rejected. There is a lot of noise and texture when zoomed in. One photo had obvious moire. Perhaps these are filtered to look like this? If so, filters applied to photos is discouraged.

I also wonder how you'd keyword and title these? I'm not sure what I'd search to find them?

George F, Photographer & Forum Volunteer

A

Ashk34836948Author

Known Participant

LOL. you say it's bad but that's exactly why i shoot. the noises, the texture, the moire pattern. i asked myself why these patterns always disappear when i upload them. its not appropriate?

daniellei4510

Community Expert

What do you mean, they disappear? As in they end up under the Not Accepted tab? Personally, I don't see any value in these from a commercial standpoint.

Adobe Community Expert | If you aren't submitting your assets in sRGB, you probably didn't read the rules.

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.