Skip to main content
AugustT
Participating Frequently
January 28, 2023
Question

I've had a number of images rejected for "technical quality."

  • January 28, 2023
  • 4 replies
  • 193 views

Some of these, upon consideration, I agree with. Others, however, I just don't understand.

 

For example, I had some watercolor backgrounds that were rejected. No, they don't have even edges, but also, no pixelation or anything like that. Resolution is high, and the high res images look fine to my eyes.

 

I've seen other, similar images already in the catalog that look the same, yet they passed muster.

 

Is there a keyword like "grunge" that gives you a pass on things that aren't exactly photorealistic?

 

Thanks for any suggestions!

This topic has been closed for replies.

4 replies

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
January 28, 2023
quote

No, they don't have even edges,


By @AugustT

This is an edge:

This is also a fault, IMHO:

 

And your scan is not sharp. Either you have upscaled your drawing afterwards, or your scanner produces scans that are blurred.

 

The rejection is correct and comprehensible.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
AugustT
AugustTAuthor
Participating Frequently
January 28, 2023

Here is one of the watercolors backgrounds that were rejected.

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
January 28, 2023

Sometimes you simply do not see the errors, sometimes moderators consider something you introduced voluntary as a defect. Show ONE example in the quality as submitted, and we will take a look at it.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
RALPH_L
Community Expert
Community Expert
January 28, 2023

you need to show us an example.