Skip to main content
Participant
September 18, 2023
Answered

Illustrations not accepted becouse of quality problems

  • September 18, 2023
  • 6 replies
  • 568 views

Hey together i have a bunch of illustrations made with generative AI that have been rejected i think mainly for the same reason but what could it be? What do i have to correct to pass?

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer daniellei4510

If your goal is photorealistic portraits, make sure they are photorealistic. Note the right eye and the malformed ear in this example. 

6 replies

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
September 18, 2023

And may I make ONE more suggestion...and it's only a suggestion based on my personal experience: Ditch the female robots. They are so overdone on the AI sharing boards. It seems like everyone new to AI starts out with these, which is fine for getting one's feet wet, but know when it's time to get serious and dive in head first with new and experimental prompting. I'd also recommend moving away from 1:1 aspect ratios. 9:16, 16:9, 14:11, 8:10, 1:2...just about anything else but 1:1.

I lied. TWO suggestiona. I myself am guilty of creating a lot of photorealistic images of females. It's because of my background as a former figure, fashion, and portrait photographer. Out of 230 images accepted so far, only 2 were rejected. But they are far from my best sellers. What I sell the most of are food, animals, still lifes, landscapes, wallpapers, and people actually DOING something other than just posing and looking pretty.

Adobe Community Expert | If you aren't submitting your assets in sRGB, you probably didn't read the rules.
Participant
September 19, 2023

very much thx for that advice, actually you are completely right. I am totally new to the AI sector and i am still learning. For now i am using a pretty sheap AI becouse i can generate as much pictures as i want without pay for every single one. Its actually payable for me with 20 bugs a month but i am looking for a better alternative with better resolutions and the option to create others stuff as well besides humans^^ But my actual AI can only create humans ^^ What Ai are you using to create your artworks? is midnight journey maybe something to look at ? I saw that even some of that "training pics" of mine have been accepted so i would accept to pay a higher price for an AI if it produces more sellable output. Actually only 10/50 have been accepted even if i just created them for training, that far from beeing enough ^^

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
September 19, 2023

I use Midjourney. It's not cheap at between $10 to $30 per month, but it generates very acceptable results without having to make an extraordinary number of iterations to achieve acceptable results. They will still need editing (99.9% of all AI generated images do), but to date it is the most reliable for generating photorealistic results. Examples attached. Good luck!

 



Adobe Community Expert | If you aren't submitting your assets in sRGB, you probably didn't read the rules.
jacquelingphoto2017
Community Expert
Community Expert
September 18, 2023

Hi @Dirk32317626s796 

Just to add to what is already said: The eyes are not correctly aligned for files 1, 2, 4, 7 and 10. 

The neck is protruding over the collar in the third file

There is a sleeve and a fastener issue for the fourth file.

The 10th file has a number of alignment issues. The ayes are not in line and the mouth seem to be at an incorrect angle in relation to the nose.

These are a lot of files to process, therefore I did not do all. As said earlier, zoom in on your files to examine them in all their details and you will find multiple issues with each of them.

 

Just a note:

If your files are not appropriate for regular search the moderator will place in "Safe Search". If it's not appropriate for the platform the moderator will give you a commercial appeal refusal.

 

Best wishes

Jacquelin

 

 

daniellei4510
Community Expert
daniellei4510Community ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
September 18, 2023

If your goal is photorealistic portraits, make sure they are photorealistic. Note the right eye and the malformed ear in this example. 

Adobe Community Expert | If you aren't submitting your assets in sRGB, you probably didn't read the rules.
daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
September 18, 2023

Were these downsampled to make them easier to upload? If they were submitted as is, I'm surprised they made it through at all, since they would not meet the minimum size requirements required by Adobe. Although upscaling would only exacerbate some issues already mentioned by others.

Adobe Community Expert | If you aren't submitting your assets in sRGB, you probably didn't read the rules.
Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
September 18, 2023

OK, I just looked into your first 2. Check your assets at 100% for sharpness, you will see that the assets here are very blurry and blurry.

Then you have aliasing and artefacts:

You also have clipping in the background:

 

In addition, your pictures have no colour profile!

 

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

 

 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
RALPH_L
Community Expert
Community Expert
September 18, 2023

Several focus issue and some artifacts in some images.
But get real, look at your images.
In the first image the right eye is too dark.
In the second image the eyes are different collors.
In the fith image, the bottom of the eye is flat.
In the sixth image, the eye lid is overexposed.
That is just the eyes.
Also, some of the images may be too sexy for Adobe.