Please CC I often get images declined due to technical reasons and I shoot with highest possible technology (mavic 3 and newest Sony camera, carefully examine images for dust specks etc) and its very frustrating... I wish Adobe would add some more specific feedback.
I think your drone needs to be closer to the ground. Are you shooting video or still photos?
The Reviewers only job is to review thousands of assets each week as quickly and accurately as humanly possible. If Reviewers stopped to give feedback to every contributor, there'd be no time to review assets. The wait queue would be 9 months long 😦. Nobody wants that.
It's really important to zoom in between 100-200% and carefully inspect throughout the image. Underexposure is apparent even in the small size, but as you start to zoom in the focus and noise issues become more apparent.
Please CC I often get images declined due to technical reasons and I shoot with highest possible technology (mavic 3 and newest Sony camera, carefully examine images for dust specks etc) and its very frustrating... I wish Adobe would add some more specific feedback.
You also need to check for focus and artefacts and noise. Your picture is out of focus, has very little detail and a rather high noise level. In addition, I see chromatic aberration. In addition, the asset is highly underexposed:
BTW: It's a Hasselblad camera.
Adobe will not give more specifics for the refusals because:
This is not a photography school.
You are supposed to submit correct assets.
Moderators refuse on the first error they see and not on all errors in the image.
Giving more explanations would increase the moderation time very much. Indeed, image moderators choose between 1 and 5 reasons. And some time ago, Adobe even got less specific because formerly, they indicated focus, exposure, noise and artefacts separately. It's simply faster.
ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer