Skip to main content
Participant
January 10, 2021
Answered

image rejected technical issues?

Hi  all. My images were rejected as on one or more technical issues. Can someone tell me the reason for below images.

This topic is closed to new replies. Start a new post to keep the conversation going.
Abambo
AbamboCorrect answer
Community Expert
January 19, 2021

The "Suzuki" image, besides having a logo in plain view, which will not get accepted at all, even if Suzuki would sign an ip release, is extremly noisy.  In addition you see sensor or lens dust.  The Susuki image would get accepted as illustrative editorial however, if presented without technical faults or other troubles.

The second picture, besides havin a watermark in, it also is framed wich is alsow not allowed. If you look at the image at 100%, you will see that the image carries a lot of noise. 

 

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

3 replies

RALPH_L
Community Expert
Community Expert
January 20, 2021

View your photos at 100% or more.

The first photo: 

  • too much  noisey in the dark areas. You need to do noise reduction.
  • the motor logo needs to be removed.

The secnd photo:

  • the signature needs to be removed.
  • the dark green pile, left of the small bird should be removed.
  • the dark water needs noise reduction.
Translate
Abambo
Community Expert
AbamboCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
January 19, 2021

The "Suzuki" image, besides having a logo in plain view, which will not get accepted at all, even if Suzuki would sign an ip release, is extremly noisy.  In addition you see sensor or lens dust.  The Susuki image would get accepted as illustrative editorial however, if presented without technical faults or other troubles.

The second picture, besides havin a watermark in, it also is framed wich is alsow not allowed. If you look at the image at 100%, you will see that the image carries a lot of noise. 

 

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

Translate
ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Legend
January 10, 2021

Someone more expert than me can probably help you discover the technical issues. Your photos must be to the highest professional standards. One however has a signature: this is forbidden, of course: did you ever see a million dollar advert with the photographer's signature? The rules clearly forbid this. The other will need an IP release from Suzuki.

Translate