Skip to main content
J.A.carreras
J.A.carreras
Participating Frequently
June 28, 2023
Answered

imagen retirada 251434936

  • June 28, 2023
  • 3 replies
  • 641 views

No enriendo que ocurre con mi fotografia mas vendida,,, de buenas a primeras desaparece de mi coleccion y aparece en no aceptada, pese a llevar puesta 4 años sin ningun problema. s aparece esta  explicacion con titulo" imagen no aceptada"

Gracias por darnos la posibilidad de revisar la imagen. Desafortunadamente, hemos encontrado que no se adapta a nuestras necesidades, por lo que no podemos aceptarla en nuestra colección.

¿Esto es normal? como digo una fotografia con 24 descargas, esto es sin duda un error, ¿donde puedo reclamar que se ponga de nuevo en mi galeria? ¿ no se puede pedir revision a esta decision?

No entiendo nada la verdad....

alguien puede explicarme esto

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer Abambo
quote

Desconocia que en tu pais considereis algunas pesonas  ofensivo  a lo que llamas " apropiacion cultural" en mi pais lo consideramos censurar el arte. 

 

By @J.A.carreras

As Adobe stock is not an art business, it can't be art censorship. It's a decision that Adobe takes, based on legal advice and customer reaction. It's absolutely not an appreciation of the picture's quality, or it's value as a piece of art. This is simply a change of the appreciation and is inline with other decisions that othe companies take. Just to name, and out of my memory: Uncle Ben's became Ben's. This was a business decision. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben%27s_Original

3 replies

Abambo
Community Expert
AbamboCommunity Expert
Community Expert
June 29, 2023

Adobe reviews from time to time assets and there was more than one person who claimed that such pictures are offensive. In America, there are a number of well known sports clubs who changed their name because of cultural appropriation. This is part of a cultural awareness. https://www.npr.org/2022/02/06/1078571919/washington-commanders-name-change-native-americans#:~:text=The%20Washington%20Football%20Team%27s%20new,came%20after%20decades%20of%20disappointment.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
    J.A.carreras
    J.A.carrerasAuthor
    Participating Frequently
    June 29, 2023

    Muchas gracias por tu respuesta abambo.

    Un saludo.

    Nancy OShea
    Community Expert
    Nancy OSheaCommunity Expert
    Community Expert
    June 28, 2023

    1. Cultural appropriation is offensive to indigenous people.  

    2. It's Adobe's platform and Adobe decides what's suitable.

    3. Stock decisions are final.  There is no appeals process. Sorry.

     

    I have no doubt that Stock received more than one customer complaint about the image.  It's offensive to me and I'm not from an indigenous tribe.  I think it's in bad taste for commercial use and should never have been accepted.  Adobe Stock did the right thing in taking it down.

     

    Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
    J.A.carreras
    J.A.carrerasAuthor
    Participating Frequently
    June 28, 2023

    Lamento que considere ofensiva mi imagen, no debio ser asi para los publicistas que compraron la licencia 24 veces.

    mi fotografia no esta incluida en el listado que pone la persona al que me remite el hilo como explicacion, por lo que estoy seguro que adobe se limito a sacar todas las fotografias con  etiquetas similares, puedo decirte que la modelo es mi esposa y en efecto no es indigena, pero estaras deacuerdo que seria realmente dificil identificar por las pinturas de su cara de que nacionalidad es o a que etnia pertenece.

    Me queda claro que no se producira una revision y que es la casa de adobe y es adobe el que decide arbitrariamente, nada que objetar.

    Desconocia que en tu pais considereis algunas pesonas  ofensivo  a lo que llamas " apropiacion cultural" en mi pais lo consideramos censurar el arte. 

    graacias por responder

    Un saludo.

    Gracias por tu respuesta

     

    Nancy OShea
    Community Expert
    Nancy OSheaCommunity Expert
    Community Expert
    June 29, 2023

    This has nothing to do with art.  It's about respect for other's people's cultural beliefs, symbols & rituals.

     

    The Native North American headdress is a well-known symbol of strength and bravery.  It's a great honor to wear and make one. Only the most powerful and influential tribe members earn the right to wear one.

     

    It's disrespectful to place a sacred headdress on a non-native American person who hasn't earned that right.  If you put Pope Francis' sacred papal vestments on your wife and took her picture, it would be highly offensive to Roman Catholics. The sword cuts both ways.

     

    Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
    T
    Test Screen Name
    Legend
    June 28, 2023

    The rejection means, in effect, this is not the sort of photograph we wish to have in our collection (for any number of reasons). Without comment I refer you to this discussion: https://community.adobe.com/t5/stock-discussions/how-to-get-adobe-to-crack-down-on-cultural-appropriation-in-photos/m-p/12326033, which might inform any discussion with Adobe.

    J.A.carreras
    J.A.carrerasAuthor
    Participating Frequently
    June 28, 2023
    Me gustaria saber cuales son esas razones, la fotografía lleva 4 años y 24
    descargas sin ningún problema con ustedes en este tiempo, creo que merezco
    saber por que ahora esta fotografía no es adecuada para su colección si
    durante este tiempo si fue adecuada y obtuvieron beneficios con su venta.
    Les ruego que me ayuden a comprender el motivo de su exclusión.
    Un saludo.
    Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
    Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices