Skip to main content
This topic is closed to new replies. Start a new post to keep the conversation going.
Nancy OShea
Nancy OSheaCorrect answer
Community Expert
February 1, 2023

Besides the clipping issues mentioned by @Jill_C 

  • Octopus eyes are bizarre.  They normally have small slits for eyes because they are very sensitive to light.
  • Cheetah's spots are blurry.
  • Flamingos have no feet.  If standing in something, there's no context for it here.

AI synthesis is imperfect with details.  Inspect AI art carefully and fix what you can.

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
View reply

7 replies

Abambo
Community Expert
AbamboCommunity Expert
Community Expert
February 4, 2023

This is wrong:

 

 

 


Compare this to real flamingos:

 

 

(Aliasing)

 

Translate
ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
    Nancy OShea
    Community Expert
    Nancy OSheaCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
    Community Expert
    February 1, 2023

    Besides the clipping issues mentioned by @Jill_C 

    • Octopus eyes are bizarre.  They normally have small slits for eyes because they are very sensitive to light.
    • Cheetah's spots are blurry.
    • Flamingos have no feet.  If standing in something, there's no context for it here.

    AI synthesis is imperfect with details.  Inspect AI art carefully and fix what you can.

     

    Translate
    Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
    Jill_C
    Community Expert
    Jill_CCommunity Expert
    Community Expert
    February 1, 2023

    In each of the animal images, composition is an issue because parts of the animal are cropped off. 

    Translate
    Jill C., Forum Volunteer
      Laurin28188507dbf1Author
      Participant
      January 31, 2023

      [DUPLICATE POST MERGED WITH ORIGINAL TOPIC BY MODERATOR.]

       

      Can you help me why these images got rejected using generativ AI? Thanks in advance 🙂

         

      Translate
      George_F
      Community Expert
      George_FCommunity Expert
      Community Expert
      January 31, 2023

      In general if you view in to 100% view in Lightroom/Photoshop you'll see the details are very soft and blurry with these.

      The cheetah may have too shallow of a depth of field to be accepted, but I can't tell with the details being so soft.  

      The goat image had several random spots/artefacts that are common with AI photos that are on one hand creative, but on another hand very likely considered a technical imperfection by Adobe.  The goat photo also had some aliasing/jagged edges when zoomed in, which is common with upscaling.

      I hope that helps!

      Translate
      Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
      Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices