Skip to main content
Participating Frequently
March 24, 2020
Answered

Intellectual Property Refusal?

The following photo's were rejected due to an intellectual property violation. Can anyone tell me what intellectual property is shown in the following images? The only possible violation I can think of is the last photo, where the guy on the left has some text on his shirt which is probably a logo?

 

This topic is closed to new replies. Start a new post to keep the conversation going.
Abambo
AbamboCorrect answer
Community Expert
March 27, 2020

The second picture definitively needs a model release and does not contain IP related items. But you may look also into your keywords and title for IP related things. A title "This is not a coke" would get a clear IP related refusal, even when on the picture nothing in relation with IP would be pictured.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

16 replies

Participating Frequently
March 27, 2020

Just to clarify, the model release is not the issue. All of these images got refused due to intellectual property violation and I am trying to find out why Adobe gave IP as a reason. This way I can either reupload these images or keep the intellectual property rules in mind for my future uploads. 

Translate
Ricky336
Community Expert
Community Expert
March 27, 2020

Clothing would come under IP!!!

Translate
Ricky336
Community Expert
Community Expert
March 27, 2020

For images 1&2, have you considered their clothing? For #2 the man is wearing clothing of religious significance is he not? Sadhu? 

Adobe is rather particular about IP rights, so they may consider this to be possible Property Rights violation, as well as your other images.

Translate
Participating Frequently
March 27, 2020

Thanks for your reply, I hadn't considered clothing to have IP rights. The man in #2 is indeed a Sadhu! Thanks for your input and I will keep it in mind for my next shots!

Translate
Ricky336
Community Expert
Community Expert
March 25, 2020

The logo is definitely a reason for refusal, but did you also have a model release for the people? If not, that is another reason. You most definitely need a model release for images 1,2,4!

Translate
Participating Frequently
March 26, 2020

Thank you for your reply. I understand that photo's 1, 2 and 4 need a model release but I still don't understand why images 1 and 2 contain 'intellectual property'. Image 3 has no identifiable people or logo's at all and also got refused due to intellectual property violation. 

Translate
Legend
March 26, 2020

Item 3 looks like a theatrical performance, with designed staging. It may not be but checkers have to assume it. As such it would be IP and need a release from the producer. 

Translate