Skip to main content
Known Participant
February 26, 2019
Answered

Is it an identifiable property issue only?

  • February 26, 2019
  • 1 reply
  • 800 views

I had this photo rejected. The property is not a publicly recognized property (general public). It certainly is private property. Are there other technical issues as well?  I came across this, on my morning walk. Thanks for taking the time to review

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer Abambo

I don't see that much problems with a property release. It may pass, it may not pass.

But there are technical issues: The image is not sharp and there is a lot of chromatic aberration.

So I personally would give you a clean refusal on those merits. The sharpening can probably not be corrected.

Unsharp (100%):

          

Chromatic aberration:

(etc)

In addition I see noise in the darker areas.

1 reply

Abambo
Community Expert
AbamboCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
February 26, 2019

I don't see that much problems with a property release. It may pass, it may not pass.

But there are technical issues: The image is not sharp and there is a lot of chromatic aberration.

So I personally would give you a clean refusal on those merits. The sharpening can probably not be corrected.

Unsharp (100%):

          

Chromatic aberration:

(etc)

In addition I see noise in the darker areas.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
nathanirAuthor
Known Participant
February 26, 2019

Thanks for your critique. I see what you mean. On the sharpness issue, there was a tangle of wires, that I tried to remove and that probably led to that. I am just beginning and appreciate your insight. Any suggestions on the chromatic aberrations. I had checked the checkbox in LR. What would you do differently? Any place that I can read up / YT. Would you not expect some noise in the darker areas especially when it is unevenly lit. My camera is a relatively basic one Canon 450D. Thanks again.

Ricky336
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 26, 2019

I think the moderator is right in his/her decision of IP. Even though it is private property, it is most definitely recognisable!