Participant

Answered

Is it really quality issue?

Forum|Forum|2 years ago
December 11, 2023
6 replies
1202 views

I am quite new as contributor. I uploaded 50 images, illustrations and photos and most of them are accepted. But for a series (18 illustrations) none of them are accepted. Unfortunately I saw later that I uploaded them as Photos, not Illustrations by mistake. Now the rejection cause is quality issues but maybe my mistake is the reason?

I uploaded some of them. Thank you!

Contributor critique

This topic has been closed for replies.

Correct answer George_F

Oh! I really like these! But yes, there are noticeable quality issues.

Tech 8: the woman is missing an arm and the shadow doesn't make sense. The collar is abnormally shaped. The shoes are a different shape. The area around the eyes and nose is abnormally drawn.

Tech 1: some or the books are abnormally shaped and some have bindings on both sides. The lady is missing one hand and there is something unnatural in it's place. The facial features are off. The shadow under the chair looks odd.

Tech 7: The runners hands are oddly shaped. The pant leg graphic doesnt appear fluid. The shape of back looks unnatural.

AI gets a little better every day, but these are classic AI errors. I hope this perspective helps!

Nancy OShea

Community Expert

Are these hand drawn or Generative AI?

It matters because AI images often contain defects that must be corrected before you submit them to Stock.

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert

Abambo

Community Expert

Generative AI. I would bet your head on this!

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Nancy OShea

Community Expert

I was thinking along the same lines. Just wanted to be sure.

AI generated illustrations have far more problems than photo realistic ones. I don't know why but they do.

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/generative-ai-content.html

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert

L

lasoniceceAuthor

Participant

Thank you all for your feedbacks! I am kinda relaxed that they are really quality errors, I was sad that is completely my mistake 🙂 I will be more cautious.

Jill_C

Community Expert

When generating AI images, I think you can safely conclude that artifacts, weird details, and anomalies are NOT completely your mistake! However, the unpredictable results from AI prompts requires you to be very vigilant in detecting and fixing those errors.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

daniellei4510

Community Expert

That's for sure. I just spent the better part of two hours putting fingernails on a pair of otherwise perfectly rendered hands covering the nose and lips of a a perfectly rendered portrait.

Adobe Community Expert | If you aren't submitting your assets in sRGB, you probably didn't read the rules.

George_F

Community Expert

And I will add that there is some room for artistic creativity and abstract aspects to an illustration, but some of them are very noticeably AI defects and I think thats where the Quality Issues Rejection comes into play. At least from my perspective.

George F, Photographer & Forum Volunteer

George_F

Correct answer

Community Expert

Oh! I really like these! But yes, there are noticeable quality issues.

Tech 8: the woman is missing an arm and the shadow doesn't make sense. The collar is abnormally shaped. The shoes are a different shape. The area around the eyes and nose is abnormally drawn.

Tech 1: some or the books are abnormally shaped and some have bindings on both sides. The lady is missing one hand and there is something unnatural in it's place. The facial features are off. The shadow under the chair looks odd.

Tech 7: The runners hands are oddly shaped. The pant leg graphic doesnt appear fluid. The shape of back looks unnatural.

AI gets a little better every day, but these are classic AI errors. I hope this perspective helps!

George F, Photographer & Forum Volunteer

Jill_C

Community Expert

tech 1.png - the face and hands are not well drawn

tech 8.png - the face and the headphones? don't make sense. The shadow detail on the feet is odd.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

Abambo

Community Expert

tech 7 2: Shows visible artefacts.

(btw: for a PNG file artefacts are impossible, so they have been initially JPEG files with high compression).

Tech 8: Shows also artefacts, but has in addition drawing errors:

In addition, I find the “white balance” off. As it is no photo, there is no white balance, but white should be white.

Tech 1:

You have the same “white balance” problem. The face and the hands are weird. Even if you have some freedom with illustrations, it should feel correct.

I doubt that your AI was very kind with the woman's breast anatomy.

Artefacts:

Wrong shadow stop.

There is more to detect. The moderators need only to check up until the first error.

In addition: you should submit assets with no transparency as JPEG files. The artefacts you have in your pictures result of high compression JPEGS, that won't get corrected by saving as PNG. The source file(s) was (were) contaminated.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Scanning file for viruses.

This file cannot be downloaded