Participant

Question

It seems that it does not confirm with all the work

Forum|Forum|2 years ago
December 7, 2023
6 replies
1294 views

Šį darbą generuoja dirbtinis intelektas. Jis nėra nei geriausias, nei blogiausias, tačiau jis nebuvo patvirtintas. Buvo atmesta 150 darbų, visi iš eilės. Priežastys yra standartinės. Pavyzdžiui, kas yra blogiau už šį darbą FAILAS #: 639560184

Fotolia

This topic has been closed for replies.

V

verkelisAuthor

Participant

reason for rejection: Thanks for giving us the chance to consider your image. Unfortunately, this image doesn't meet our quality standards so we can’t accept it into our collection.

Abambo

Community Expert

reason for rejection: Thanks for giving us the chance to consider your image. Unfortunately, this image doesn't meet our quality standards so we can’t accept it into our collection.

By @verkelis

Only the header. But from the stock text you show, we know that the rejection reason is “Quality Issues”.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

V

verkelisAuthor

Participant

Okay, there's the frame and the karma, and then these are yours for what? Thank you

Abambo

Community Expert

Nice pictures.

Moon:

There are minor artefacts, nothing that I would qualify as catastrophic. But yes, moderators are very strict these days. Maybe, you should look at the sky, where there is a kind of pattern visible.

I would also add more local contrast and vibrancy. That makes the picture more attractive (visually). You will, however, need to be careful, as that also accentuates the artefacts.

The motorbike:

There are visible artefacts, visible even at a smaller size. There is no doubt that the refusal here is justified:

In addition, I'm missing the second handle.

And just to be clear, the artefacts are not only in those areas that I selected, but pretty over the whole image:

Very uncommon for a generative AI asset: the exposure is not right. Blacks (left) and whites (right) are missing.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Abambo

Community Expert

What was the rejection reason? We only need the header.

From a preview you cannot see the asset quality.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Nancy OShea

Community Expert

Adobe Stock has raised the bar on quality standards. Images that were accepted in the past might not get accepted today.

See my reply in this related topic from yesterday:

https://community.adobe.com/t5/stock-contributors-discussions/not-sure-why-image-was-rejected/m-p/14282352#M74040

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert

Jill_C

Community Expert

The obvious difference between the accepted image and rejected image is the ragged frame, so I think @daniellei4510 may be right as to that being the reject reason. You may be able to confirm that premise by cropping it to eliminate the ragged edge and resubmit.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

daniellei4510

Community Expert

The spattered edges would be considered a frame and framed images are almost always rejected. An efffect such as this should be up to the buy to create from Adobe's point of view.

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.