Looking to hear comments about the quality issues on my rejected images

I just looked into brotacao.png: In addition to what has been said, it is underexposed as shown on the histogram:

Whites and highlights are missing.

I did not look into the other pictures; however, I suppose you did not submit PNG files. You should show us exactly the pictures as submitted. You also should retrain of adding plenty of images here. It should be generally enough to submit one to three pictures. Errors are often repeated, and you can apply a similar assessment to your other rejections. It's also good practice, as a newcomer, to submit your pictures in smaller batches and wait for the reaction. It will be more rewarding, knowing the refusals, reacting to the refusals and correcting pictures beforehand.

As you submit to stock and stock is a professional service, Adobe can assume that you are a professional. The moderation is not done to give you a critique of your photographic talent, but to protect customers from bad pictures. In that sense, it is a great deal, that Adobe even gives you some indication of the (first) error that the moderator saw.

Image moderation is time and cost intensive, any delay would make stock unprofitable and moderation would take months.

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

Thanks again for all your comments. 

I think I have enough advice to continue my learning and improve my future photos. Could a moderator please close this topic?

Hello,

As you are a newcomer to this photography thing, I would highly recommend spending some time going through the Adobe help user -guide. 

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html

Lots of important information. 😁

Thanks you all for your kindness in providing me a feedback on the images. I believe Adobe could provide reasons for rejecting photos, which would be helpful in improving.

First of all, these should have been JPEG files and not PNG! The Adobe PNG files should have transparent backgrounds.

Hi @Fabio27816783q009 ,

EDX-spectrum.png is noisy, has blue color fringing with lines that are not smooth. The geometry is not good. Vertical lines are not vertical.

Brotacao.png has a white balance issue, noisy and too much negative space. Also, the subject is not completely in focus.

Mosca.png seem to have a white balance issue and poor cropping.

Broto.png subject is too small and not completely in focus.

Sunset12.png is underexposed and details are lost in the shadows.

Florvioleta3.png subject is small and out of focus. It is a bit underexposed.

Follow the details at this web page to inspect and correct the others that can be corrected.

Best wishes

Jacquelin

EDX_spectrum.png - blurry, not well composed. What are you trying to illustrate here ?

brotacao.png - harsh lighting (flash?) abd shadows. Depth of field is too shallow, rendering most if the image out of focus.

mosca.png - watermark not permitted 

calcadao.png - not much in focus, color noise in the clouds

cactus.png - depth of field to shallow, chromatic aberration 

the protocol here in the forum is to upload 2-3 images for comment. Few people are going to take the time to comment in all 9.

zoom in to between 100-200% to inspect your images before uploading, and the technical issues should become readily apparent.