More images rejected today.

10 replies
571 views
Translate

These AI images were rejected due to quality. I have made sure to label them correctly. Any critique is helpful and appreciated. Thank you.

Contributor critique

S

Sienna1Correct answer

Inspiring

As @daniellei4510 said, Moderators are required to get as many images approved in the shortest time possible. They aren't given the time to highlight errors, or even check multiple boxes. The expectation is that Contributors are able to assess their own images. Fortunately, many of the community members here, who are also Stock Contributors, are willing to spend a bit more time pointing out specific issues. Spend some time looking at other recent posts here, and you'll start to get a better idea of what Adobe considers acceptable quality for AI images.

Thank you! I have been spending time browsing other posts as well trying to learn as much as possible!

Abambo

Community Expert

Quality rejections have nothing to do with labelling the assets. Quality means quality, bad rendering and other errors in your assets.

I really can't say which one of the errors did get the moderator to refuse these assets, but if that is the new standard, than moderators are getting better.

Translate

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

S

Sienna1Author

Inspiring

Thank you. I am really new at this so I am probably going to get more rejections than not in the beginning. I wish the quality message had a checkbox with a list of 10 issues that could give more insight into what the common issues are.

Translate

daniellei4510

Community Expert

That's what this forum is for. 🙂 Moderators are given seconds to accept or reject and image and don't have time to be specific, even if the process were simplifed enough to allow for checking boxes. And those checked boxes still wouldn't tell you much compared to what you can learn here.

Translate

Adobe Community Expert | I have miles to go before I sleep, but I'm all done on this end.