So I uploaded an image I took with the telescope I use in an observatory. It was rejected becuase they believe it is generative AI. It took me 30 hours to collect the data for that image and I can say with certainty that it is not generative AI! So how do I convince Adobe?
I just had my first 'Missing Generative AI Flag' for a photo of a Kookaburra that I had taken. Others in the series were accepted, they are not AI and I have the Raw files to prove it but it isn't worth resubmitting, Shutterstock and iStock accepted it. I have no AI generated photos in my extensive stock portfolio. Camera and drone only for me 🙂
It may have been incorrectly tagged. We've been recommending that contributors getting this rejection re-submit the asset with a property release. But yes, if you don't feel like going through all that and other similar assets have been approved, you may not wish to resubmit. Or do it on another day and see what happens.
Translate
Adobe Community Expert | I have miles to go before I sleep, but I'm all done on this end.
OK, I learned now (because people posted the correct refusal reason) that there is a really new refusal reason, that says, “Missing Generative AI Flag”. Is that the refusal you got, or is it NON-COMPLIANT IMAGE?
Translate
ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Your asset is underexposed noisy and not sharp. The blacks are not deep dark, either light grey. It's an impressive asset, if you can find out how to address the flaws, it will make a nice addition to your portfolio.
Translate
ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Your asset has been refused for being non-compliant: NON-COMPLIANT IMAGE. There are multiple reasons for getting this refusal. It's not only having uploaded an unmarked generative AI asset.