Skip to main content
paulom10974015
paulom10974015
Participant
August 23, 2021
Answered

Não entendi por que foi rejeitado

  • August 23, 2021
  • 1 reply
  • 752 views

Não entendi o porquê de serem recusadas. Essas fotos foram feitas em médio formato com um a NOBLEX 150U. Gostaria de entender

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer Abambo

Great picture, but it's black and white and contains noise:

The Noblex is a great camera for artistic photography, but you should avoid any classic non-digital camera for stock photography. The scanned pictures never have that clinically clean look that modern digital cameras produce.

1 reply

Abambo
Community Expert
AbamboCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
August 23, 2021

Great picture, but it's black and white and contains noise:

The Noblex is a great camera for artistic photography, but you should avoid any classic non-digital camera for stock photography. The scanned pictures never have that clinically clean look that modern digital cameras produce.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
    paulom10974015
    paulom10974015Author
    Participant
    August 23, 2021

    Bom, cada um tem uma visão. A sua joga fora todos os mestres que  fotografaram em analógico. O ruido, que no caso é granulação, pois as fotos foram feitas em 6 x 6 por uma Mamiya c330 e por uma Noblex 150U. Digitalizadas com um Imacon Flextight 949. Vendi muito essas fotos que foram recusadas. Inclusive a última venda foi feita para um dos maiores hospitais do Rio de Janeiro, retirando dos bancos de imagem essa venda, pela falta de visões diferentes e uma estetica mais elastica. É uma pena não vender essas fotos na plataforma.

    Abambo
    Community Expert
    AbamboCommunity Expert
    Community Expert
    August 24, 2021

    I know that the noise comes from the grain. I photographed analogue for a long time and only switched to digital photography when the quality of the digital images surpassed that of the analogue and the cameras were affordable. There is no question that the images are interesting. It's just that they are not suitable for the kind of stock photography that Adobe markets. I don't know which stock provider markets such images.

     

    For your information: I am not an Adobe employee. I am a contributor myself, and my images are examined with the same meticulousness as those of all other contributors.

     

    I wish you continued success with your pictures.

    ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
    Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
    Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices