Nature

Forum|Forum|4 years ago
August 16, 2021
5 replies
384 views

This topic has been closed for replies.

Correct answer Abambo

The picture looks like having those in-camera-generated faux DOF and artefacts. In addition, it has no detail (out of focus), the whites are blown out (over exposed). And I agree with @Ricky336: the composition is bad.

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

jacquelingphoto2017

Community Expert

Hi @PhotoShootFood,

There was a camera shake, also there was not enough depth of field. Most of the frame was not focused plus the shake.

Best wishes

JG

Photographer and Nutrition Author

Abambo

Correct answer

Community Expert

The picture looks like having those in-camera-generated faux DOF and artefacts. In addition, it has no detail (out of focus), the whites are blown out (over exposed). And I agree with @Ricky336: the composition is bad.

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer