Skip to main content
Restylerphoto
Participating Frequently
April 14, 2026
Question

Не могу разглядеть технические проблемы в видеоролике. Но они есть. На что смотреть?

  • April 14, 2026
  • 4 replies
  • 91 views

Начал пробовать делать видео для адобесток. Глаз еще не набит и я получаю много отказов по качеству. На что обращать внимание, никак не пойму.

Ну вот например: 

Подскажите, где косяки искать?

    4 replies

    Nancy OShea
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    April 15, 2026

    AK3 Look at the hands.  Her outer (pinky) finger is too long.

    4K9 & 15 a noticeable green light reflection in eyeglasses.

     

    Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
    Cosmic Studio
    Inspiring
    April 14, 2026

    Hi, the only technical issue I noticed is in the second video, between seconds 1 and 2, where the hands lose detail as they cross.

    That said, I believe the videos may have been rejected due to “Uniqueness,” and also because the movements may be too simple for today’s AI standards. Over a year ago, I generated at least three videos similar to your third one, and they never sold. It’s hard to compete with real footage in these themes.

    If I were to try again in these popular topics, I’d focus on “convincing emotions.”

    For example, in a fitness theme, the woman could be dealing with knee pain. The model in the first two videos could be a businesswoman facing a stressful situation at the office. If you can create videos with believable emotions in these themes, I think they could perform well for a long time.

    Restylerphoto
    Participating Frequently
    April 15, 2026

    Thanks for the reply and the advice. One of the stock sites I used to use had a 'no commercial value' rejection reason. Honestly, if they’d just told me that, I would’ve understood right away instead of digging for technical issues. I totally agree with you — the themes aren't exactly original. I'm just experimenting with familiar topics right now to get a feel for how everything works.

    Cosmic Studio
    Inspiring
    April 15, 2026

    Is the other stock site Dreamstime? If so, they don’t accept AI images or videos featuring potentially identifiable people, which in practice rules out assets with visible faces.

    Just to add some context, I believe your assets might have been accepted on Adobe Stock some time ago. But today, the combination of competition from real content and how easy it is to generate similar AI videos to the ones you submitted makes things more challenging.

     

    the themes aren't exactly original

     

    That’s probably the main challenge: coming up with an idea that’s both original and still generic enough to work for stock while also being commercially appealing… 🤔

    And it’s worth being emotionally prepared for this too: if you land on a strong idea, copycats will likely follow and replicate it without hesitation. It’s something everyone with a good idea has faced throughout history.

    daniellei4510
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    April 14, 2026

    Understand I’m not expert when it comes to creating videos, but I have had three accepted. In each case, I added about ½ second’s worth of still or video frames at the beginning and end to act as handles, which Adobe highly recommends in order to allow the buyer to briefly fade in or out to black or more easily create transitions from one video to another. I think these handles are especially important for 5 second clips, which allow little room for transitions other than quick cuts. Personally, if I decided to continue creating videos in the future, I wouldn’t submit anything less than 8 seconds, given Adobe’s increasingly stricter quality requirements.

    Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
    Restylerphoto
    Participating Frequently
    April 15, 2026

    That’s a great tip, thanks! I’ll definitely keep that in mind.

    Restylerphoto
    Participating Frequently
    April 14, 2026

    Забыл указать, что ролики делаю с помощью ИИ. Но это наверное и так понятно.