Need consulutation regarding quality issues

They are not pixel perfect, but also not meant to be viewed under high zoom.

By @Andrew28402168wx0r

===========

Then don't submit them to Stock.  Save them for use in personal projects.

Adobe Stock customers expect the highest visual and technical quality for use in commercial projects -- print, digital and textiles.  Nothing less than the highest quality will do.

• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustrations.ug.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/how-to/tips-stock-image-acceptance.html
• Model/Property Releases:
  https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/model-release.html
  https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/property-release.html

I have a set of images that are getting refused due to quality issues even after i fixed everything i could think about. They are not pixel perfect, but also not meant to be viewed under high zoom, and i can't understand which parts are still seem like an issue for adobe staff. Can you help me identify problematic spots?

Also another question - for some images like this, review time takes 2 days, when the others i have are 3+ month in review. Is this normal?

 

By @Andrew28402168wx0r

Your assets need to be pixelperfect as they will be viewed under 100% zoom. You will neeed to post the asset here by using the drag&Drop area for attachements. 

And yes: it is normal to have assets getting moderated fast and others waiting in the queue for a longer time. If the assets do not get moderated after 4 months, it is safe to assume that they are stuck in the queue. You can safely resubmit and then delete the first submissions. 

Yes, lately it has been normal to have some assets reviewed sooner than others. If assets have been gone unmoderated for over 5 months, we've been recommending they be deleted and resubmitted.

Was the image of the woman also one that was rejected? Count the fingers. And it doesn't matter if was not meant to be reviewed at large sizes. It's one of the reasons we often recommend viewing assets at 200% before submitting. Because that's what the moderators do.