Skip to main content
This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer Abambo

There is no detail left over (hair, plants) and the image is lacking contrasts. I've seen colour artefacts in this region:

There is a white line around the objects.

The cause for this is the sharpening, probably after the noise reduction.

The highlights are missing (right of the histogram)

 

… and the picture shows oversaturated colours.

 

It's awful, I like the picture and it's a great idea. But the technical errors make it not acceptable to stock.

8 replies

Abambo
Community Expert
AbamboCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
February 1, 2023

There is no detail left over (hair, plants) and the image is lacking contrasts. I've seen colour artefacts in this region:

There is a white line around the objects.

The cause for this is the sharpening, probably after the noise reduction.

The highlights are missing (right of the histogram)

 

… and the picture shows oversaturated colours.

 

It's awful, I like the picture and it's a great idea. But the technical errors make it not acceptable to stock.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Jill_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 1, 2023

Underexposed, over saturated, soft focus, magenta tinge in the clouds.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
January 31, 2023

You also have other artefacts with this picture. It's a nice picture, however, I fear you'll have more quality issues that you can fix here. 

 

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Legend
January 31, 2023

(Extra note - this would also need a Model Release, but that is NOT the cause of rejection in this case).

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 1, 2023
quote

(Extra note - this would also need a Model Release, but that is NOT the cause of rejection in this case).


By @Test Screen Name

It may not be required!

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/model-release.html

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Legend
February 1, 2023

Interesting. I may be wrong, but I thought that a model who could identify themselves would need a model release, whatever part of them is visible. The unique situation (setting and flag, jumping) seems to me to mean that the model could identify themselves. But the "open mouth" pic is interesting. This is surely a carefully staged shot; the model would know exactly who they were, at least if the white material was actually in the photo. So by the rules I would try to follow, a release would be required (indeed, required for every staged shot). But Adobe's picture examples suggest otherwise.

RALPH_L
Community Expert
Community Expert
January 31, 2023

Nice, however, the shadows are a little dark  and the top of the flag is cut off.