Participant

Answered

no cumple nuestros estándares de calidad. QUÉ SIGNIFICA?

8 replies
670 views
Translate

This topic is closed to new replies. Start a new post to keep the conversation going.

AbamboCorrect answer

Community Expert

There is no detail left over (hair, plants) and the image is lacking contrasts. I've seen colour artefacts in this region:

There is a white line around the objects.

The cause for this is the sharpening, probably after the noise reduction.

The highlights are missing (right of the histogram)

… and the picture shows oversaturated colours.

It's awful, I like the picture and it's a great idea. But the technical errors make it not acceptable to stock.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Abambo

Correct answer

Community Expert

There is no detail left over (hair, plants) and the image is lacking contrasts. I've seen colour artefacts in this region:

There is a white line around the objects.

The cause for this is the sharpening, probably after the noise reduction.

The highlights are missing (right of the histogram)

… and the picture shows oversaturated colours.

It's awful, I like the picture and it's a great idea. But the technical errors make it not acceptable to stock.

Translate

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Jill_C

Community Expert

Underexposed, over saturated, soft focus, magenta tinge in the clouds.

Translate

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

Abambo

Community Expert

You also have other artefacts with this picture. It's a nice picture, however, I fear you'll have more quality issues that you can fix here.

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

Translate

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

T

Test Screen Name

Legend

(Extra note - this would also need a Model Release, but that is NOT the cause of rejection in this case).

Translate

Abambo

Community Expert

(Extra note - this would also need a Model Release, but that is NOT the cause of rejection in this case).

By @Test Screen Name

It may not be required!

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/model-release.html

Translate

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

T

Test Screen Name

Legend

Interesting. I may be wrong, but I thought that a model who could identify themselves would need a model release, whatever part of them is visible. The unique situation (setting and flag, jumping) seems to me to mean that the model could identify themselves. But the "open mouth" pic is interesting. This is surely a carefully staged shot; the model would know exactly who they were, at least if the white material was actually in the photo. So by the rules I would try to follow, a release would be required (indeed, required for every staged shot). But Adobe's picture examples suggest otherwise.

Translate

RALPH_L

Community Expert

Nice, however, the shadows are a little dark and the top of the flag is cut off.

Translate

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.