Known Participant

Answered

Non-compliance rejection, File ID: 731066368 Original name: D85_8558 Blue Oyster Mushrooms.jpg

9 replies
871 views
Translate

Looking for some help. What can I change to make the image more acceptable? The explanation for rejection isn't clear. Non-compliant image, undeclared AI, use of another artist's name and non-compliant with overall guidelines. Not sure what any of those mean. It's not an AI image

Contributor critique

This topic is closed to new replies. Start a new post to keep the conversation going.

Ricky336Correct answer

Community Expert

Hello,

This is a bit strange

Did you blur this part? Quality could also be a factor here!

Also, look at your keywords - did you use any brand name in the keywords - or keywords that could be mistaken for a brand name?!

There can be a variety of reasons for this rejection, so it is a bit hard to determine what exactly.

Abambo

Community Expert

Well, there are clearly reasons to reject this asset for quality issues.

As for the non-compliant image, there are multiple reasons that may trigger that, probably keywords, title, but may also be the content.

Translate

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

T

Thomas_MorrisAuthor

Known Participant

Thanks for your answer! Clearly, I need to examine my images more closely! I would reject that one too. This will help me!

Translate

Abambo

Community Expert

You're welcome.

Translate

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Ricky336

Correct answer

Community Expert

Hello,

This is a bit strange

Did you blur this part? Quality could also be a factor here!

Also, look at your keywords - did you use any brand name in the keywords - or keywords that could be mistaken for a brand name?!

There can be a variety of reasons for this rejection, so it is a bit hard to determine what exactly.

Translate

T

Thomas_MorrisAuthor

Known Participant

Thank you! No, I didn't intentionally blur it. It's a focus stacked image that I didn't inspect closely enough. Everyone is coming in with the same critique and it's encouraging! I can inspect my images more closely to either fix them or start over.

Translate

daniellei4510

Community Expert

Setting aside the "official" reason for rejection, I'm not quite sure what's going on in this image. Areas that have no reason to be out of focus are severely lacking in detail. Over-processing? Not sure. But there doesn't appear to be any logical reason why these areas are so soft in comparison to similar areas on the same plane of focus. Interestingly enough, these issues are very similar to what can happen in an AI generated image, and perhaps this is the reason for the official rejection. Because a camera simply wouldn't do this.

Translate

Adobe Community Expert | I have miles to go before I sleep, but I'm all done on this end.

T

Thomas_MorrisAuthor

Known Participant

Ah! This was a focus stacked image that I didn't inspect closely enough! Thank you! This will encourage me to examine my images more closely, especially when I do a focus stack! Thanks!

Translate

Abambo

Community Expert

Well, that explains the weird blur on your assets.

You should examine your assets at 100%. If you think you see an issue, going to 200% or even further will help to identify the issue.

Translate

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.