Participant

Answered

Not accepted due to Technical Issues - any ideas as to why?

Forum|Forum|4 years ago
January 27, 2022
5 replies
292 views

The original photo was manipulated by copying to 30 layers and rotating each layer by .02 degrees from each other then merged into this result. Any thoughts on perhaps what the technical issue(s) would be to have had it rejected? The original photo was tack-sharp - perhaps the moderators have deemed it out of focus? Thank you for any assistance you are able to provide!

This topic has been closed for replies.

Correct answer Nancy OShea

It's interesting but not flexible for use a Stock image.

Adobe Stock's DO's and DON'Ts specifically mention special effects.

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustrations.html

Effects

Don’t: Add sunrays or flares.

Don’t: Create mirrored images, kaleidoscopes, or patterns.

Don’t: Use effect filters.

Don’t: Add vignettes or frames.

Community Expert

Community Expert

Stock is not a good place for such images. Especially that I suspect some technical issues in the original take.

Anyhow, why not submitting the original and letting the buyer apply the effects needed?

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Community Expert

Correct answer

Community Expert

It's interesting but not flexible for use a Stock image.

Adobe Stock's DO's and DON'Ts specifically mention special effects.

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustrations.html

Effects

Don’t: Add sunrays or flares.

Don’t: Create mirrored images, kaleidoscopes, or patterns.

Don’t: Use effect filters.

Don’t: Add vignettes or frames.

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert

Test Screen Name

Legend

Adobe are looking for "realistic" photos - this is art, and it may well be good art, but that isn't what they buy... right or wrong...

Community Expert

Community Expert

Artisticaly nice but look at the sky at 200%. Full with streaks.

Community Expert

Community Expert

It makes for an interesting abstract, but indeed I'm sure the Moderator saw nothing in focus. I also wonder what commercial value this would have....

Jill C., Forum Volunteer