Not sure why these got rejected?

Forum|Forum|3 years ago
January 5, 2023
13 replies
887 views

I mean the quality isn't like ultra 4k but it's not bad.

Contributor critique

This topic has been closed for replies.

Correct answer Abambo

Generative AI? You claim, the quality is not bad?

Just checked one, very fast, at 100% and I saw the aliasing from the upscale:

This means that the quality is bad!

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

T

Test Screen Name

Legend

P.S. If you wonder why Adobe are so picky and look so closely, it's because Adobe's stock customers do exactly that before they use the pictures on adverts, billboards etc. If it isn't absolutely perfect, Adobe's customers complain and get their money back. Adobe's reputation suffers badly. So Adobe work hard to make sure problems never make it to sale... so you aren't just trying to please Adobe, you're also working to please every possible customer of Adobe...

Abambo

Community Expert

Moderation is done to protect customers from bad pictures. It's not to make creators better creators.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Jill_C

Community Expert

Before you spend any more time uploading images that have obvious flaws, read ALL of the material in the Adobe stock help pages. This page clearly states that you must inspect your images at 100%.
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustrations.html

The help pages will help you to understand the quality level Adobe is looking for.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

Ricky336

Community Expert

I mean the quality isn't like ultra 4k but it's not bad.

By @Tranquil_Flamingo5CF1

Sorry, but the quality is bad!

@Abambo pointed out the issues concerned!

Did you do any upscaling? If so, don't.

Also, have a read about submitting AI illustrations:

T

Tranquil_Flamingo5CF1Author

Participant

Like I said before I didn't realize images were being zoomed in, when not zoomed in the image looks fine, that's why I assumed the image quality was ok.

T

Test Screen Name

Legend

Adobe's reviewers will zoom into 100%-200% and check every detail carefully. You need to do the same in Photoshop or similar. Look over every aspect of the image, after it passes the "looks great" test. This image was clearly increased in size. If this was done by the AI, then the AI is useless to you. If it was done by you, then DON'T - Adobe forbid it. Submit only at the natural size. If the AI makes work that is too small to submit, then the AI is useless to you...