Photo not being accepted to Adobe Stock

---

...can I have some guidence on what they are looking for?

==========

Adobe Stock customers expect the highest visual and technical quality for use in commercial projects -- print, digital and merchandise.  Read your Contributor User Guide for more tips.

• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustrations.ug.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/how-to/tips-stock-image-acceptance.html
• Model/Property Releases:
  https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/model-release.html
  https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/property-release.html
  
  

Before you submit, compare your best work with similar Stock inventory to see if Stock needs what you're selling. And if the quality is better than what Stock has now.  As a customer, would you buy it?

https://stock.adobe.com/search?k=pink+feathers

Hope that helps.

The first, besides having such a narrow DOF that it becomes unusable, exposes a lot of noise and artefacts:

Your second is also extremely noisy, but the DOF is a bit better.

If you check the sky with your third, you'll see colour clipping:

A similar issue can be found here:

The patina is clipping and the contrast is so high, that there is no detail with the gutter.

At AdobeStock, photos with a wide range of focus are more likely to pass the review.
Also, photos with noticeable noise will be rejected.
Please enlarge your photo to 100% to check it.

The DOF in the first two images is too shallow, causing a lot of the frame to be out of focus, and the third image is not well composed and has artifacts in the sky.

The two top images do appear unsharp to me, as though enlarged to an extreme.