Photo rejected, would like and and all feedback

The image is clearly a photograph. I could not find any indication of it being an AI image and still don't. It's a shaggy dog with thick long hair. Depending on the angle, hair will obscure some parts as in the case of the eye, and the foot shape will look different because of the long hair. One just need to zoom in closely to see what's going on.

Best wishes

Jacquelin

This photo was rejected and I would jut like feedback to help me inprove, the explination from Adobe is vague.

Appreciate your time.

By @mjmagee

Even vague, it's useful to know on what grounds the moderator rejected an asset. I suppose this here were "quality issues".

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

Firstly, it is an AI-generative photo - so, you have to indicate it as such when you submit it. 

Secondly, the white balance is indeed out of whack - it's too green!

I agree. It is AI and not a photo. Also look at the grass between the legs. The back is blurred as it should be and the front is not as blurred as the rest.

There are signs indicating that this might be AI and not a photo. In any case, there are areas that need improving and the dog's front leg looks somewhat unnatural.