My work was rejected based on quality standards and I wanted to get your feedback on why. Nothing specific was mentioned about my image, only general examples like exposure issues, soft focus, excessive filtering or artifacts/noise.no matter how slight.
The text with the refusal is stock text, not targeted to your asset. Check your asset at 100% and submit only if it is perfect. Yours is exposing a lot of errors introduced by upscaling and sharpening. Do not forget: when you upscale, you upscale also the imperfections.
And when doing portraits, you need to get the eyes in focus, in photography and with generative AI.
ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
If you are new to AI, then in addition to traditional editing, you will usually find that you need more AI to fix AI. I ran this through facial restoration software for her face, and image enhancement software to smooth out the hair. I whitened the teeth. I used PortraitPro to slim her chin and cheekbones just slightly. I also removed the haloing on her collar.
I still don't believe these fixes would result in an acceptance, as the skin tones and over all sepia quality of the image would still result in a refusal.
Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
Yes. I wasn't trying to make it perfect. Another pass through enhancement software might improve upon that. But that gets pricey, and that's not my job. 🙂 The hair is too smooth as well, and too much follow-up work would be involved in general. The point was, most AI results can benefit from further use of AI editing tools.
Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.