please give me your opinion

Hi @husky36456471r0f3 ,

The baby's right eye protrude with a sharp angle.

There's also a problem with the second baby eyes and also chromatic issues at the edge of the subject.

There's a problem with the eyes nose and mouth of the next file. That file too has chromatic noise.

The next image has blue shadows and sections without definition.

Best wishes

Jacquelin

These are the issues. there are probably more:

Each of the red circles and arrows points to a problem in your asset, that will earn you a refusal if detected. A lot of the troubles are probably causes, because you did not address the issues in your file before upscaling, so the got enhanced. 

Only looking at the first photo:

The left hand the fingers are wrong.

The right side of the head above the eye is wrong.

There is something in his mouth.

There are artifacts between some light and dark areas.

The hair in the back is wrong.

It's very important to understand that there is presently no AI program that can produce stock-ready images. They will ALWAYS need some degree of editing, from simple adjustments to results that would be too difficult to edit by even the most skilled Photoshop professional. Inspect every detail of your images at 100% following upscaling. Fix images if you can, discard them if you can't. 

_7bd6c457-ca05-4e99-b848-bd450e8acb73-transformed.jpeg - her pupils are different sizes; the underside of her upper arms are a mess... they look like plastic dolls.

_7bd6c457-ca05-4e99-b848-bd450e8acb73-transformed.jpeg - baby's forehead and nose are messed up. mom's nose if poorly drawn. Mom's ring finger isn't drawn properly.

_c50f9f7f-32b0-41cd-89d9-a85aa3a71af2-transformed.jpeg - baby's eyes are really weird and he's missing a finger on his right hand.

_dd40054d-9b95-4dbc-bf83-e7970acfbe66-transformed.jpeg - not enough fingers; forehead is weirdly dented in. Crib rail pad is drawn incorrectly.

_dd400: The baby only has four fingers

_c50f9: The baby's eyes are weird

_bd07: The woman's ring finger and the white spots near her nose

_7bd6: The woman's left eye was poorly rendered

These are just a few issues after taking a quick look on my laptop. There may be more, but it only takes one to result in a refusal.

What was the rejection reason?

Synthetic AI generated people that come out looking like dolls rather than real people are of no interest to me as a Stock customer.  Just saying...

Adobe Stock customers expect the highest visual and technical quality for use in commercial projects.  Read links below for more tips.

• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustrations.ug.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/how-to/tips-stock-image-acceptance.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/generative-ai-content.html
  ===========
  Model/Property Releases:
  https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/model-release.html
  https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/property-release.html