Skip to main content
yanniks3080571
Known Participant
May 25, 2025
Answered

Quality Issue with fotos

  • May 25, 2025
  • 4 replies
  • 1066 views

Hi, the following picutres were denied because of quality issues. Can somebody point out what could be the issue(s)?

Correct answer Abambo

Nice to see such images as real photography and not easily produced generative AI.

 

You have chromatic aberration , and I think you will need to improve the post-processing.

There is also some “strange” “noise”
 visible (here seen at 200%).

 

You have clipping in the whites and blacks, especially the blacks look artificial, the whites allow editing that leads to a more equilibrated histogram.

 

4 replies

vit0c72708961
Inspiring
May 27, 2025

Complimenti foto magnifiche e suggestive, probabilmente chi le ha rifiutate deve avere seri problemi emotivi ed avere gli occhi parzialmente bendati!!!!

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 28, 2025
quote

Congratulations magnificent and suggestive photos, probably those who refused them must have serious emotional problems and have partially blindfolded!!!!


By @vit0c72708961

This is not social media. This is business. The potential client could buy the picture for a billboard-size advert. Or a wallpaper. They would see the issues and be very unhappy with the result. If they need a stamp-size image, the quality is sufficient.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Abambo
Community Expert
AbamboCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
May 26, 2025

Nice to see such images as real photography and not easily produced generative AI.

 

You have chromatic aberration , and I think you will need to improve the post-processing.

There is also some “strange” “noise”
 visible (here seen at 200%).

 

You have clipping in the whites and blacks, especially the blacks look artificial, the whites allow editing that leads to a more equilibrated histogram.

 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
vit0c72708961
Inspiring
May 27, 2025

A me sembra assurdo questo vostro impegno ad usare microscopi digitali ed altri utili strumenti per visionare particelle nel microcosmo delle particelle per giustificare un rifiuto su una foto ottenuta sicuramente con grande impegno e professionalità.

Probabilmente nella visione complessiva della foto clipping, aberrazioni e piccole porzioni non definite non creano alcuna percezione disturbante!!!

A me sembra che semplicemente si sta esagerando su questa ed altre foto che tecnicamente sono superiori a tutte le vostre osservazioni super ed iper tecnologicamente artificiose.

Mi scuso se scrivo in italiano ma non parlo inglese.

Jill_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 27, 2025

Have you read the Adobe Stock Contributor help pages? Examining images zoomed in at 100% or more is exactly what Adobe recommends as that allows you to locate flaws, such as soft focus and noise and other artifacts, that would not otherwise be obvious. The guidelines can be found by clicking the "Learn & Support" link at the top of your Contributor page.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
Jill_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 25, 2025

Are these AI images or real photographs?

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
yanniks3080571
Known Participant
May 26, 2025

This is a water drop collision fotography, no AI

Jill_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 26, 2025

This is a water drop collision fotography, no AI

The reason I asked is that some of the droplets don't look realistic, but I've never attempted water droplet photography. These are all quite interesting and colorful.

 

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
RALPH_L
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 25, 2025

The only thing that I see are the small areas of overexposed highlights toward the bottom of each photo.

 

Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 25, 2025

Focus issues.

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
yanniks3080571
Known Participant
May 26, 2025

Thanks