Quality Issues

Short answer: They're not suitable for commercial use. 

Stock customers want high quality commercial content for use in magazines, books, product labels, TV commercials, movies, games, t-shirts, tote bags, etc... 

Compare your best work with what Stock is selling.  

As a customer, which would you buy?

https://stock.adobe.com/search?k=pushing+pram

https://stock.adobe.com/search?k=pushing+baby+stroller

Also read your Contributor User Guide for more tips.

• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustrations.ug.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/how-to/tips-stock-image-acceptance.html
• Model/Property Releases:
  https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/model-release.html
  https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/property-release.html
  
  

Hope that helps. Good luck. 

I have to agree. Other than depth of field being a problem, mthe photos are not well cropped and show no specific subject matter and because of that, they have no commercial value.

Hello,

In my opinion, the composition could be a lot better. The photos are not compelling.

What point do you want to get across?

The 'quality issues' also include composition.