Skip to main content
C
Cloud5FEE
Participant
February 27, 2024
Answered

QUALITY ISSUES AI IMAGES

  • February 27, 2024
  • 4 replies
  • 475 views

Hello everyone,

I've been uploading ai images before without any problems and they were all accepted. Moreover, I believe that the details and quality of the previously accepted pictures are less. Even though I spent more time and added more detail to the last images I uploaded, they are rejected due to quality problems.

 

I am attaching an example of previously accepted (ss_1) and non-accepted (ss_2) examples.

Thank you in advance for your opinions and help.

    This topic has been closed for replies.
    Correct answer daniellei4510

    Both should have been rejected. ss_1 is close, but there are issues with the headdress and jewelery. The rejected image has flyaway hairs, weird earlobes, dust spots on the shoulder pads, and irises that aren't prefectly round or identical to each other. The more experienced moderators are coming down hard on AI generated images. For the rejected image especially, I don't think you put as much time into it as you might think. 🙂

    Finally...square images are such a trobe anymore for AI gen. Try different ratios. 16:9, 10:8, 5:7, or whatever. Allow room for copy and improved compositions.

    4 replies

    Abambo
    Community Expert
    AbamboCommunity Expert
    Community Expert
    February 28, 2024
    quote

    Hello everyone,

    I've been uploading ai images before without any problems and they were all accepted. Moreover, I believe that the details and quality of the previously accepted pictures are less. Even though I spent more time and added more detail to the last images I uploaded, they are rejected due to quality problems.


    By @Cloud5FEE

    Moderators are getting better at detecting errors and at least some moderators are today rejecting assets that would have been passed half a year ago.

     

    Why? 

    • There is now a big database available, Adobe can be more selective.
    • Customers complained and the related costs get higher with the amount of bad assets in the database.
    • Adobe want's to maintain a high standard also with generative AI assets.
    • The customer has a right to get correctly edited assets, with as less errors as possible.
    ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
    Jill_C
    Community Expert
    Jill_CCommunity Expert
    Community Expert
    February 27, 2024

    I agree with @daniellei4510  on both images. The first one has drawing errors in the earrings, and the earrings don't match.

    The second image has errors on the earrings, eyes and teeth.

    Jill C., Forum Volunteer
      daniellei4510
      Community Expert
      daniellei4510Community ExpertCorrect answer
      Community Expert
      February 27, 2024

      Both should have been rejected. ss_1 is close, but there are issues with the headdress and jewelery. The rejected image has flyaway hairs, weird earlobes, dust spots on the shoulder pads, and irises that aren't prefectly round or identical to each other. The more experienced moderators are coming down hard on AI generated images. For the rejected image especially, I don't think you put as much time into it as you might think. 🙂

      Finally...square images are such a trobe anymore for AI gen. Try different ratios. 16:9, 10:8, 5:7, or whatever. Allow room for copy and improved compositions.

      Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
        Ricky336
        Community Expert
        Ricky336Community Expert
        Community Expert
        February 27, 2024

        Hello,

        Without looking into too much detail, the white balance can be adjusted a bit. The 'photo' is on the cool side, a bit blue, so you could warm it up a bit, and add more contrast; the photo is a bit flat.

        Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
        Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices