Skip to main content
Participant
February 27, 2024
Answered

QUALITY ISSUES AI IMAGES

  • February 27, 2024
  • 4 replies
  • 475 views

Hello everyone,

I've been uploading ai images before without any problems and they were all accepted. Moreover, I believe that the details and quality of the previously accepted pictures are less. Even though I spent more time and added more detail to the last images I uploaded, they are rejected due to quality problems.

 

I am attaching an example of previously accepted (ss_1) and non-accepted (ss_2) examples.

Thank you in advance for your opinions and help.

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer daniellei4510

Both should have been rejected. ss_1 is close, but there are issues with the headdress and jewelery. The rejected image has flyaway hairs, weird earlobes, dust spots on the shoulder pads, and irises that aren't prefectly round or identical to each other. The more experienced moderators are coming down hard on AI generated images. For the rejected image especially, I don't think you put as much time into it as you might think. 🙂

Finally...square images are such a trobe anymore for AI gen. Try different ratios. 16:9, 10:8, 5:7, or whatever. Allow room for copy and improved compositions.

4 replies

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 28, 2024
quote

Hello everyone,

I've been uploading ai images before without any problems and they were all accepted. Moreover, I believe that the details and quality of the previously accepted pictures are less. Even though I spent more time and added more detail to the last images I uploaded, they are rejected due to quality problems.


By @Cloud5FEE

Moderators are getting better at detecting errors and at least some moderators are today rejecting assets that would have been passed half a year ago.

 

Why? 

  • There is now a big database available, Adobe can be more selective.
  • Customers complained and the related costs get higher with the amount of bad assets in the database.
  • Adobe want's to maintain a high standard also with generative AI assets.
  • The customer has a right to get correctly edited assets, with as less errors as possible.
ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Jill_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 27, 2024

I agree with @daniellei4510  on both images. The first one has drawing errors in the earrings, and the earrings don't match.

The second image has errors on the earrings, eyes and teeth.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
daniellei4510
Community Expert
daniellei4510Community ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
February 27, 2024

Both should have been rejected. ss_1 is close, but there are issues with the headdress and jewelery. The rejected image has flyaway hairs, weird earlobes, dust spots on the shoulder pads, and irises that aren't prefectly round or identical to each other. The more experienced moderators are coming down hard on AI generated images. For the rejected image especially, I don't think you put as much time into it as you might think. 🙂

Finally...square images are such a trobe anymore for AI gen. Try different ratios. 16:9, 10:8, 5:7, or whatever. Allow room for copy and improved compositions.

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
Ricky336
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 27, 2024

Hello,

Without looking into too much detail, the white balance can be adjusted a bit. The 'photo' is on the cool side, a bit blue, so you could warm it up a bit, and add more contrast; the photo is a bit flat.