Skip to main content
Participating Frequently
September 14, 2026
Question

"Quality Issues" in aerial photo

  • September 14, 2026
  • 23 replies
  • 139 views

I got “Quality Issues” rejection of the attached photo. Can anyone enlighten me what exactly is wrong with the quality?

    23 replies

    ZALEZPHOTO
    Legend
    September 14, 2026

    Jean, how many photographers does it take to change a lightbulb?

    10! One to change it and 9 who insist they could have done it better.

    The fact is everyone here is well intentioned. Yet more are preoccupied with their personal opinions, than clear objectivity.

    My take is simple. 30+ years working as a professional comercial photographer, and over 2.5 million shots taken in my career.

    I already gave you my opinion and suggestion on your aerial shot, now I encourage you to ignore the noise and become the absolute best critic of your work… and remain patient with rejections that have gotten out of control recently.

    Cheers!

     

    ZALEZPHOTO
    Nancy OShea
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    September 14, 2026

    You asked about reasons for Stock refusal, which you have received here.

    Questions about technical correction can be posted in Photoshop, Camera Raw, Lightroom or Lightroom Classic forums. 

    https://community.adobe.com/community

     

    Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
    Nancy OShea
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    September 14, 2026

    This will definitely be refused for Privacy Violation. To use this photo commercially, you’ll need signed model releases from all people on the beach. 

     

    Stock Reviewers are not allowed to check more than one refusal box per submission, even when multiple reasons apply.  You’ll need to fix this before you submit a 2nd time.

     

    If you crop out people and focus on kayaks. it might be OK for use. But the long shadows might be a challenge for buyers.

     

    This is what you’re competing with in drone kayaks:

    https://stock.adobe.com/search?k=kayaks+beach+drone

    Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
    Ricky336
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    September 14, 2026

    Hello,

    I don’t think overexposure is an issue. The highlight is a recovery tool, so one can even recover even it if it is -100! (Provided there is still enough detail to recover!!)

    A possible issue is rather - I think - related to the sensor size. A small sensor as on a drone, is not as good as a ‘full frame’ sensor on a DSLR. So, when enlarged, problems appear. The same reasoning as with using film. A small film e.g. 110 film that was used last century! 😁vs 120 medium format film.

    You should remove the distracting elements (people) - that will help. However, having people in it, will cause other problems! So, you could have a beach shot, summer holiday with no people!!😁

    You could lighten it overall a bit as well.

     

    Participating Frequently
    September 14, 2026

    I think that if people were a problem, I would get a different rejection reason. And they a not recognizable, I think.

    As for lightening the picture… hm, makes sense

    Ricky336
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    September 14, 2026

    That is another box to tick; the moderators tick one, and they chose quality - it’s the most common! The individual person would recognise themselves.

    Participating Frequently
    September 14, 2026

    Fair enough about distractions. As for the photo temperature - it was shot at sunset time, so colors should be warm IMHO :) Thanks for your example!

    daniellei4510
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    September 14, 2026

    Understood, but I have always believed that what the camera sees and what we see are often two different things. It’s why our cameras have different settings for different kinds of lighting conditions. If I’m taking a photograph in a room with incandescent bulbs, I have the creative choice of taking a photograph under those conditions (resulting in photograph with a yellow cast), or I can set the camera to make the necessary adjustments to avoid the yellow cast (or adjust them later in post). Same applies here. I’ve been on vacations to a lot of very sunny locations, including Mexico and Santa Fe, but a green tree still looks like a green tree me me, not one with a yellow cast. From a creative standpoint, one might very well prefer the version with the strong yellow cast. But when it comes to stock, one is not always creating images for oneself, but for others (with the moderators being the judges what gets accepted and what doesn’t. In any case, good luck going forward!

     

    Adobe Community Expert | I have miles to go before I sleep, but I'm all done on this end.
    daniellei4510
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    September 14, 2026

    Personally, I find it a bit strong on the yellow and I would have eliminated the bottom distraction at the very least.

     

    Adobe Community Expert | I have miles to go before I sleep, but I'm all done on this end.
    ZALEZPHOTO
    Legend
    September 14, 2026

    I tend to agree with you on the sharpness. I have a mini 3 and mini 5, the difference is huge. All the mini 3 photos I ran thru Topaz Sharpen or Denoise, and the vast majority accepted.

    My offer stands!

    Cheers!

    ZALEZPHOTO
    Participating Frequently
    September 14, 2026

    Thank you!

    yamato713108855
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    September 14, 2026

    Is this the original size?
    The highlights seem a bit blown out.

    If the person's face is recognizable, a model release is also required.

     

    Participating Frequently
    September 14, 2026

    In my previous post the photo had 70% quality on export because the forum has limitation on file sizes. Here is how photo looks like in Lightroom before I exported it with 100% quality for AdobeStock. So i think overexposure is not the issue here

     

     

     

    yamato713108855
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    September 14, 2026

    The fact that the highlights are set to -70 suggests that the highlight areas were likely overexposed to begin with.
    Even if you lower the parameter, the image will still be rejected if the highlights visually appear "blown out."

    ZALEZPHOTO
    Legend
    September 14, 2026

    A few months ago Adobe changed how we attached photos in the forum, and I keep saying it’s impossible to tell if the photo is in focus or not. What drone are you using?

    One option is using Topaz Labs tools to sharpen. Lately Adobe Stock is rejecting most of what I upload, then approve in the second batch.

    I am extremely frustrated with this situation, but my sales keep increasing so it’s something I’m willing to put up, believing it will get solved. 

    Save your titles and key words, so that all you have to do is copy and paste.

    Let us know what happened when you resubmit.

    Best of luck!

     

    ps. if you don’t have Topaz tools, DM me so I can show you what it does.

    Happy Monday!

    Francisco

    ZALEZPHOTO
    Participating Frequently
    September 14, 2026

    I’m using DJI Mini Pro 3 and the photo looks quite sharp to me. Here I’m attaching the 100% scale of the softest part of the photo - top right corner. I find it’s sharpness quite acceptable unless the sharpness standards went up recently that I’m not aware of…

     

    I might give it a second try later, thank you for the hint!