Quality Issues with Stock Photos

Both assets have chroma noise and are badly composed. The second is also not correctly focussed. Obviousely the landscape is the main subject, but the focus seems to lie on the tower. The pictures look like some holiday snapshots, and not like well thought and composed images. I would recomend to you to join a photo club to learn the basics of composition, noise and exposure.

They never point out specific errors. That would be a time consuming operation, and in addition, they refuse at the first error they see. There is no need for them to check further, as the asset will anyhow need to be rejected. A rejected asset very probably contains more than one error.

Hello,

I think you could improve your composition! Composition also covers quality issues!

Composition:
https://www.adobe.com/creativecloud/photography/discover/photo-composition.html

You don't say exactly where in Europe. But this is what your windmills are competing with in Stock inventory: 

https://stock.adobe.com/search?k=ancient+windmills

Speaking as a customer, images have more commercial value when the structures are in full view. Ideally, you don't want to clip your main subject.  

Adobe Stock customers expect the highest visual and technical quality for use in commercial projects.

• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustrations.ug.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/how-to-submit-distinct-content.html
• Property Releases:
  https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/property-release.html
  
  

Hope that helps.

The first image is noisy, and the second image is underexposed in the shadows and leaning. It would have been better to compose it without cutting off the top of the building.

The shadows need to be lifted and the tower straightened.