Question about diversity in AI-generated stock images - Is this considered spamming?

Hello fellow contributors and Adobe team members,

I hope someone can provide some clarity on a question I have regarding AI-generated images and diversity representation.

As an Adobe Stock contributor who uses AI to generate images, I've been creating variations of concepts by changing the race and gender of the subjects while keeping other elements constant. I want to ensure this practice aligns with Adobe Stock's guidelines and isn't considered spamming or artificially inflating diversity.

Here's an example of my current workflow:

1. I start with a base prompt like: "A happy person working in a radio station, making a talking gesture"

2. Then I create variations such as:
- A red-haired Caucasian woman
- A bald African American woman
- An Asian woman
- A Caucasian man
- An African American man
- An Asian man

All of these would be in the same setting (radio station) with the same pose and expression.

3. Once I've covered these variations, I move on to a new concept or setting and repeat the process.

My intention is to provide diverse representation in stock imagery, but I'm concerned about whether this might be seen as spamming or gaming the system somehow.

Has anyone received guidance from Adobe on this type of practice? Do you think this approach is acceptable, or should I be doing something differently to ensure diversity in my portfolio?

I've tried contacting Adobe directly but haven't received a response yet, so I thought I'd ask the community for insights or experiences.

Thanks in advance for any advice or information you can share!