Skip to main content
December 29, 2025
Question

Question About ‘Quality Issues’ Rejections on Adobe Stock

  • December 29, 2025
  • 2 replies
  • 302 views

Hi,

I’m getting several rejections due to quality issues, and I’d like to better understand what reviewers usually flag under this category.

 

Below, I’ve attached a sample image that was rejected due to quality issues.

1.png

 

Are there specific technical details (noise patterns, upscaling artifacts, texture consistency, or maybe blur when zoom 200% etc.) that are commonly overlooked by contributors?

 

Any advice would be appreciated. Thank you.

2 replies

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 29, 2025

In addition, the green cast, though it's very subtle, is in the water as well. As @Jill_C mentioned, I'm in agreement. One doesn't want to get too "artsy" when it comes to stock. 

Adobe Community Expert | If you aren't submitting your assets in sRGB, you probably didn't read the rules.
December 29, 2025

Thank you for pointing that out, as it gives me a new perspective and helps me better understand the concern about images becoming too “artsy” for stock. Finding the right balance between maintaining a natural look and still being visually appealing is something I’m still learning, and this feedback is very helpful in clarifying that perspective

Jill_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 29, 2025

The intentional blur here probably would not have caused a rejection. The image overall is underexposed in the shadows, and that's likely to be the reason. 

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
December 29, 2025

Thank you for the explanation, I really appreciate the insight.

 

Initially, I thought the issue might be related to the image appearing slightly soft when zoomed in, so I considered using an AI upscaler to add more detail. However, in my opinion, AI upscalers can sometimes introduce artificial or exaggerated details, which may result in an oversaturated or “AI-like” look.

Because of that, I’m often unsure whether it’s better to upscale and risk artificial detail, or to leave the image slightly soft but more natural when viewed at 100%.