Participant

Answered

Re: Not sure why image was rejected

9 replies
769 views
Translate

Would like some feedback on why these images were rejected. Thanks! Appreciate it.

{moderator detatched this from a different post}

Contributor critique

This topic is closed to new replies. Start a new post to keep the conversation going.

daniellei4510Correct answer

Community Expert

#1: Focusing or camera shake

#2 Focusing, or depth of field too shallow

#3 Depth of field too shallow. I understand the creative concept, but the depth of field might have been a little TOO shallow.

Adobe Community Expert | I have miles to go before I sleep, but I'm all done on this end.

jacquelingphoto2017

Community Expert

Hi @Jerry_art5FC4 ,

You went in too close to create the first photo, hence shallow depth of field.

The second photo is not completely in focus. Too much of a shallow depth of field.

The screw head is not completely in focus and the other blur screws are distracting. You should have removed them.

Best wishes

Jacquelin

Translate

Abambo

Community Expert

Hi @Jerry_art5FC4 ,

You went in too close to create the first photo, hence shallow depth of field.

By @jacquelingphoto2017

For that and such a subject, I would guess that focus stacking would be the answer.

Translate

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

jacquelingphoto2017

Community Expert

@Abambo , are you suggesting that my answer is incorrect?

Regards

Jacquelin

Translate

Jill_C

Community Expert

Z63_0220 (1).jpg Since the object, whatever it is, is parallel to the plane of view, the entire object should be in sharp focus.

Translate

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

Abambo

Community Expert

It is a crocodile clamp, as it is used variously to hold smaller parts in position.

Translate

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

daniellei4510

Correct answer

Community Expert

#1: Focusing or camera shake

#2 Focusing, or depth of field too shallow

#3 Depth of field too shallow. I understand the creative concept, but the depth of field might have been a little TOO shallow.

Translate

Adobe Community Expert | I have miles to go before I sleep, but I'm all done on this end.

J

Jerry_art5FC4Author

Participant

I see so in images like these a larger depth of field may be more favorable?

Thanks appreciate the feedback!

Translate

Abambo

Community Expert

Sure.

Especially the second picture is a failure in that sense. But it also has an issue with the image's message. I could see, why you buy an image like the first and the third, if better executed, but I can't imagine why someone should buy the second one.

Translate

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.