Re: Rejecting work [Branched & moved to New Topic]

A moderator who likes to jokingly reject half of the works!  %))) 

And why one was accepted and the other not is really not clear! 

By @Olmyntay

I've looked at some of the size reduced pictures posted here, and even that they are reduced in size, I found reason to reject them. 

Again, and again and again, and only for you: moderation is done by humans. Even that Adobe tries to get consistent decisions, humans tend to decide one way or another, based on many factors. One factor is if they just start their workday or end their workday. So the same moderator may refuse an image based on noise in the morning, and let it pass in the evening. That is called karma. It's not, however, a major problem. A lot of us have near 100% acceptance because they submit only the best assets.

There is one regular mantra here: suddenly, I get more refusals, even that my pictures are getting better.

Until now, we were able to detect error in all those refused assets. Most often, the errors are very visible. One contributor simply blurred the faces of people and said, he had done that since ever, and the assets got accepted.

It may be true that the assets got accepted, but it still is an error to do so. If they got accepted before, the moderator did a bad job. That does not invalidate the quality criteria that are established.

I didn’t ask you this question!
And what does this have to do with games? If you really understand image errors, you won't have a hard time spotting them!
You can find a blot in anything! Give me the highest quality photo that is in the top sellers and I will find a reason why it can be rejected!
And why is it so difficult for you to accept that rejected and accepted images may indeed not have any rejection criteria?

[MODERATOR'S NOTE: It's impolite to hijack discussions away from other users. This has been branched & moved to a new topic where it belongs.]