REFUSAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Adobe uses method of scientific random poke. My image containing Taipei 101 was rejected with "intellectual property" excuse, whilst there are literally hundereds of photos sporting exactly the same view.

I assume that [inappropriate language] of a moderator in question affects acceptance process - imagine they sit in the office clicking through images that someone else is taking...of course they will take out irritation on you.

[moderator: these fora are moderated and inappropriate language will be deleted. Please keep a factual tone to the posts]

I suppose you had two or more moderators and some moderators didn't realize, that those pictures require property releases from the rights owners.

Sometimes things get past the moderators which should be rejected. If these are found later, Adobe may remove the asset, or worse. Also, the title and description are not the only thing checked. Please post ONE rejected photo, with the title and description used, so we can suggest what IP is involved. It's easy to miss something, like the name on a boat in the distance, or a recognisable pair of shoes. Or sometimes it is big things, like the Eiffel Tower at night.