Refused for technical reasons.

3 replies
460 views
Translate

Hello community. Refused for technical reasons. Thanks in advance everyone for the replies

This topic is closed to new replies. Start a new post to keep the conversation going.

AbamboCorrect answer

Community Expert

It's a nice picture for social media, but not for Adobe stock. as @George_F points out, the DOF is too shallow. In addition you have chromatic aberration.

It looks also to me that you tried to sharpen a lot, as your out of focus areas look like they have a lot of artefacts and are not smooth indeed.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Ricky336

Community Expert

Lens flare:

And of course, as mentioned the depth of field is too shallow!

Translate

Abambo

Correct answer

Community Expert

It's a nice picture for social media, but not for Adobe stock. as @George_F points out, the DOF is too shallow. In addition you have chromatic aberration.

It looks also to me that you tried to sharpen a lot, as your out of focus areas look like they have a lot of artefacts and are not smooth indeed.

Translate

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

George_F

Community Expert

With the shallow depth of field, there isn't much in focus in the photo.

The histogram was missing whites and I think the darks and shadows are a bit too dark.

There is what appears to be a light flare. Natural light flares aren't a technical flaw per say, but I don't think it benefits the photo in this case.

Hope that helps!

Translate

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.