Interesting image! I'm not sure how Moderators evaluate such a highly stylized asset, but there seem to be some drawing details that don't quite make sense such as the reflections on the edges of the continents.
Interesting image! I'm not sure how Moderators evaluate such a highly stylized asset, but there seem to be some drawing details that don't quite make sense such as the reflections on the edges of the continents.
I see some problems in the background. It is especially evident when the full image is taken. I also see dust or something similar on the ground where it was photographed. Also, it seems like this image contains a product for which a permit may be required. This may also be a reason for rejection.
I see some problems in the background. It is especially evident when the full image is taken. I also see dust or something similar on the ground where it was photographed. Also, it seems like this image contains a product for which a permit may be required. This may also be a reason for rejection.
??? It's not a photograph, it's a generative AI asset. And that has clearly been said. So no issue at all with a property release. Where do you see an issue like that?
Translate
ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
But still, the asset should look “correctly cracked”. You have blurry parts where they should be sharp. This is a typical generative AI issue and needs to be addressed before resubmitting.
Translate
ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer