Rejection Appeal: Complete 118 Periodic Table Video Series Rejected as "Similar Content"

Hello Adobe Stock Community and Moderation Team,

I am writing to seek guidance and kindly request a manual re-examination of my recently rejected video submissions (including File ID: 2210162123 and the subsequent uploads), which were declined under the reason "Similar Content / Repetitive".

I completely understand and respect Adobe Stock's strict guidelines against spamming and repetitive templates. However, I believe there is a misunderstanding regarding the commercial and educational intent of this specific project:

1. Complete 118 Element Set: This is a meticulously designed, comprehensive educational collection consisting of all 118 elements of the Periodic Table. By scientific nature, a periodic table requires absolute consistency in design, composition, color, and animation speed. If the elements were designed with different aesthetics or variations, the cohesive "set value" would be completely ruined for high-end educational editors, textbooks, and scientific documentaries.

2. Customer Demand & Continuity: Customers who purchase these clips look for identical layouts so they can seamlessly transition from one chemical element to another (e.g., Hydrogen to Helium to Lithium) on their video timelines. Missing pieces or sudden design variations break the continuity of their academic work. A fragmented periodic table has no commercial value for buyers; they need the full, uniform set.

3. Unique Textures and Metadata: Although the gold-framed cube template remains visually uniform for scientific continuity, every single asset contains completely unique atomic numbers, chemical symbols, weights, and distinct metadata/tags tailored to that specific element.

Since this is a structured, complete 118-clip encyclopedic series rather than independent repetitive loops, I kindly ask an Adobe Stock moderator or staff member to review this case manually. 

Thank you very much for your understanding, time, and continuous support.

Best regards,
An Adobe Stock Contributor