Skip to main content
O
Olexandr22522449d3x6
Inspiring
January 26, 2022
Answered

Rejection for technical reasons landscape photo

  • January 26, 2022
  • 4 replies
  • 811 views

Greetings to all. The uploaded photo was rejected for technical reasons. I tried to take into account past comments on my posts and aligned the histogram, shadows and highlights as much as possible. What else have I not learned? Thanks to everyone who answers.

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer Abambo

Thanks for the answer. When I compared the pictures on and off, in my opinion there is a difference, something like a micro-contrast is lost. Here is a photo without a filter. Also, do you think the chromatic aberrations in this image are significant and should be corrected?


 

Chromatic aberration should always be corrected, and Lightroom (Classic) is doing a good job in this. I suppose that all raw developing programs have no big trouble correcting that. You can add clarity and texture to improve the micro contrast.

4 replies

O
Olexandr22522449d3x6Author
Inspiring
January 29, 2022

Thanks everyone for the replies and advice. After editing the photo in accordance with the advice under the post, the photo was accepted

    Abambo
    Community Expert
    AbamboCommunity Expert
    Community Expert
    January 29, 2022

    Congratulations.

    ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
    RALPH_L
    Community Expert
    RALPH_LCommunity Expert
    Community Expert
    January 26, 2022

    You have to really blow it up to see. At 500% (I know) you can see fringing around the tree branches.

    O
    Olexandr22522449d3x6Author
    Inspiring
    January 27, 2022

    Thanks for the answer.

    PepeCastro
    PepeCastro
    Inspiring
    January 26, 2022

    Quizas si hubieses usado un filtro polarizador, ese verde  pareceria mas natural y enfocado

    reedesign1912
    reedesign1912
    Inspiring
    January 26, 2022

    To me, everything seemed to have a bit of a soft focus to it.  Perhaps it was a bit of wind motion on the tree leaves?  Or maybe overuse of noise reduction.  The only other comment I would make is that the white balance seems too yellow to me.  If you shot in raw, I think both of these things are correctable.

     

    On a side note, that looks like a lovely location.

     

    -Rob

    Rob R, Photographer
    O
    Olexandr22522449d3x6Author
    Inspiring
    January 26, 2022

    Thanks for the answer. There was no wind. Yes, I used the chromatic aberration removal that comes with the Сamera RAW. And it really made the picture a little softer and unsharp. I'll try to apply a corrective filter against aberrations selectively. Thanks for the advice.

    Abambo
    Community Expert
    AbamboCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
    Community Expert
    January 27, 2022

    Thanks for the answer. When I compared the pictures on and off, in my opinion there is a difference, something like a micro-contrast is lost. Here is a photo without a filter. Also, do you think the chromatic aberrations in this image are significant and should be corrected?


     

    Chromatic aberration should always be corrected, and Lightroom (Classic) is doing a good job in this. I suppose that all raw developing programs have no big trouble correcting that. You can add clarity and texture to improve the micro contrast.

    ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
    Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
    Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices