Skip to main content
Participant
December 7, 2023
Answered

Rejections

  • December 7, 2023
  • 6 replies
  • 3699 views

Hi everyone! Please help me understand why my image was rejected. I used to send images of this kind earlier and everything was fine. These are AI-generated images. The stated reason is a quality issue. Thank you!

Correct answer Abambo

Just looking at 16, I see typical AI errors in the fine lines, where the geometry should be perfect:

 

Also, the perspective of the windmills and some of the buildings is not correct. And the connection of the builings with the bottom are not correct. 

 

6 replies

Abambo
Community Expert
AbamboCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
December 8, 2023

Just looking at 16, I see typical AI errors in the fine lines, where the geometry should be perfect:

 

Also, the perspective of the windmills and some of the buildings is not correct. And the connection of the builings with the bottom are not correct. 

 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Participating Frequently
December 9, 2023

Why aren't other works in the feed affected by such trivialities?

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 9, 2023
quote

Why aren't other works in the feed affected by such trivialities?


By @SnouWmen


May be this moderator had a background in geometry. 

There are enough assets that get returned for issues like this.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 7, 2023

AI is notoriously defective.  It makes clumsy drawing mistakes.  You really need to closely inspect every quadrant of every image at   100-300% magnification.  Fix all defects if you can or discard them and start over.  You don't want to risk customer complaints & refund requests.  Submit only your very best work to Stock.  That should help reduce your rejection rate.

 

 

 

 

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 7, 2023

I also meant to add, nice concept in any case. But you'll be hard pressed to get a perfect result with something this complex without a good deal of editing. Also, regarding the windmills, some have four blades while others have three.

Adobe Community Expert | If you aren't submitting your assets in sRGB, you probably didn't read the rules.
Jill_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 7, 2023

This is an interesting series and probably something that would sell if the details were executed better. When you zoom in >100% the flawed details become more obvious. For instance, In sustainability 13.jpg some of the windmills have 3 vanes ad some have 4, and they're not symmetrically attached.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
Ricky336
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 7, 2023

Hello,

You really have to go through the images created with a fine-tooth comb to make sure there aren't irregularities in the rendition. Look for anything that seems a little unusual.

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 7, 2023

I've venture to guess it's a lot of little things that would probably go unnoticed if there were just one or two, but the architecture isn't quite on the mark, at least in the example attached. I could probably find more things to circle as well. This would probably have passed a few months ago when AI started being accepted, but the moderators are being very stringent these days.

 

Adobe Community Expert | If you aren't submitting your assets in sRGB, you probably didn't read the rules.
Participating Frequently
December 9, 2023

https://stock.adobe.com/de/images/leadership-and-city-of-green-community-business-development-strategies-with-environmental/665751209
Here is one of the latest accepted works in the feed, doesn't it have similar problems? 

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 9, 2023

Too small to review without purchasing it. (P.S. A contributor by any other name is still the same contributor.)

Adobe Community Expert | If you aren't submitting your assets in sRGB, you probably didn't read the rules.