Skip to main content
Known Participant
November 18, 2025
Answered

Same Series, Same DSLR Scan — Different Review Results?

  • November 18, 2025
  • 5 replies
  • 140 views

Hi everyone, Could someone please tell me why the horizontal photo was accepted, but the vertical one was rejected for “QUALITY ISSUES”? They are from the same series, and both were digitized from negatives using my DSLR.

Correct answer Ricky336

Hello,

I'm afraid to say that both of them have 'quality issues'. 

Not a good scan/print. Did you scan these from a negative? If so, the negative has had issues in developing. It is not a 'clean' negative. 

Likewise, the magenta sky is a problem!

 

5 replies

CYSUNAuthor
Known Participant
November 19, 2025

Thank you for your response. I also think that both images should have been rejected, so my guess is that the difference might be due to different reviewers. I’m aware that there are some issues with the white balance and the noise reduction, but these photos are accepted on other platforms such as iStockphoto, and they actually sell reasonably well there. There may be buyers who specifically look for this kind of scan from old film, since digital cameras were not yet widespread at that time. Thank you.

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
November 19, 2025

"but these photos are accepted on other platforms such as iStockphoto, and they actually sell reasonably well there. "

 

We hear this a lot. To which the usual response is that Adobe is not "other platforms." If one were to enter the same photograph in a number of different photography contests, and it took first place is one, there is no certainty or reason to beleive that it will place at all in the other contests. As far as sales go, there is no accounting for tastes. You felt the photograph was good enough to submit, iStockphoto thought it was good enough to accept, and some buyers will feel it is good enough to purchase. That's the nature of stock. But given that Adobe Stock, with its millions of upon millions of images, can well afford to draw lines in the sand when it comes to individual preferences, one will discover it is much more difficult to get assets...even otherwise perfect assets...accepted.

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Community Expert
November 18, 2025

Assets are randomly assigned to the next available Reviewer. A series of assets is often divided among multiple reviewers. 

 

Although quite noisy, the horizontal asset is better composed and contains more scenic elements. This has greater commercial possibilities for Stock customers. 

 

The vertical asset is not well composed. It's crowded, and the foreground elements are clipped. 

 

Hope that helps.

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
Ricky336
Community Expert
Ricky336Community ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
November 18, 2025

Hello,

I'm afraid to say that both of them have 'quality issues'. 

Not a good scan/print. Did you scan these from a negative? If so, the negative has had issues in developing. It is not a 'clean' negative. 

Likewise, the magenta sky is a problem!

 

Jill_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
November 18, 2025

Both are noisy and have a peculiar white balance, and both should have been rejected.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
November 18, 2025

Both are very muddy scans and in need of exposure and color correction. The vertical should probably not have been accepted as well

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.