I use a translator because I don't speak English. I didn't say Adobe was old, I said it couldn't keep up with other stock sites in terms of product review. Sometimes the translator translates incorrectly. Sometimes I look at the images of other participants and many participants design the images from artificial intelligence and many images have other watermarks in visible places that do not belong to Adobe. If real people are reviewing these posts, why do they approve them?
They are humans; they make mistakes. Usually watermarks are easily spotted, and easily removed. It isn't hard to find poor-quality AI images on Adobe Stock. Moderators have gained a lot of experience and training since Adobe started accepting AI images just over a year ago. They are much better at spotting errors now, and thus the rejection rate has gone up considerably, which has caused a lot of dissatisfaction among Contributors. When flawed images are reported to Adobe, they re-review the image and reject it if warranted. Sometimes that can trigger the review of an entire account, and is perhaps one of the reasons that images are suspended - because of poor quality assets.