Skip to main content
Participant
October 22, 2025
Question

Stock Integrity

  • October 22, 2025
  • 3 replies
  • 161 views

I am a wildlife photographer selling images for thirty plus years. I was thinking of tentatively uploading images and video to Adobe stock but I have discovered two major problems. The first is that on checking for images of Pink footed Geese, a very high proportion of images and videos are of other species, but incorrectly labelled. This suggests poorly informed suppliers (ie. photographers with inadequate nature ID skills). The second point is that there are a lot of AI images with flawed characteristics (nearly every single one was incorrect). At least wildlife artists only rarely get it wrong. So I did the same with Atlantic Salmon and found the exact same, with lots of species new to science being illustrated. Now AI definitely has a place, but not in wildlife photography or videoing and especially of behaviour. I know this will upset some people, but I only looked at two species. Imagine if I covered them all! 

3 replies

Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Community Expert
October 22, 2025

Most Stock contributors are hobbyists & amateurs, NOT experts. And for many, English is their second or third language. Reviewers aren't perfect, either. We all make mistakes. 

 

As a customer who avoids AI, I filter it out. When I come across mislabeled assets, I report the asset's ID to Stock. That's the best we can do. 

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
Participant
October 30, 2025

There were a surprisingly high portion of images mislabelled. Would you consider paying a bonus for someone like me (with a reasonable level of wildlife expertise) listing the mistakes on the wildlife images and videos to allow them to be corrected?

Jill_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
October 30, 2025

You are not addressing Adobe employees directly here in this forum. I think Adobe's position with regard to the accuracy of metadata when it comes to flora and fauna is "Buyer Beware", and they're probably unwilling to spend more money on validating the keywords on such images. However, if you want to reach out to Adobe directly on this subject, use the "Contact Us" link on your account page.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
Jill_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
October 22, 2025

Misrepresentation and false identification in AI images is definitely a problem.  I would think that any Buyer looking for real images of real animals or birds is just going to filter out AI images entirely from their search. Keep in mind also that if you search for pink footed goose you are also getting images that have just "goose" or just "pink" in the search results unless you specify that all keywords must be matched. You should also include the Latin name of the species in your keywords. Good luck in your stock journey!

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
October 22, 2025

It's definitely a buyer beware situation when it comes to AI and its depiction of breeds of animals. Like yourself as a contributor, if a buyer knows their stuff, they don't buy.

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.