Skip to main content
Inspiring
December 17, 2021
Answered

Technical issues? What technical issues?

  • December 17, 2021
  • 6 replies
  • 1281 views

Two of my latest uploads were rejected for "technical issues," and I can't see any reason for this.Would someone want to examine the two photos (attached) and tell me what I'm missing?

 

Thanks!

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer Nancy OShea

If I printed the first one, 90% would be black ink.  😥

The second image is too red.

 

 

 

6 replies

Ricky336
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 19, 2021

Hello,

Good shots yes, but the exposure and saturation is a problem I think. Do you think they would print out well?

Bugmugs2Author
Inspiring
December 21, 2021

Thanks to veryone for their sharp analyses. Very helpful, and I'll be more aware of these issues in the future. (The photo of the berries was focus stacked, and the one of the orange was light pained using the Harold Ross technique.)

 

Funny thing is, however, that my other agencies--Alamy and Shutterstock--both accepted these photos, and Shutterstock tends to me more picky than Adobe.

 

Gerry

Participant
December 19, 2021

There isnt anything wrong with your pics. Good eye

Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 19, 2021
quote

There isnt anything wrong with your pics.


By @WoodenEye56

=============

This is NOT Instagram or Facebook.  This is Adobe Stock which is used by professional content creators for commercial projects like posters, brochures, merchandise, print / TV ads, etc...  Unlike social media where anything goes, Adobe Stock has strict quality and technical submission standards that must be followed, otherwise images are rejected. 

 

For more on what Adobe Stock expects from contributors, read the links below.

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
Bugmugs2Author
Inspiring
December 21, 2021

No need to be snooty and condescending about this, Thomas. I've been shooting seriously for decades and have been selling photos for "commercial projects" for all that time, including prestigious magazines. I also have won a good number of highly competitive awards, including Nature's Best and a Wildlife Photographer of the Year winner. In fact, 95% of the photos I submit to Adobe Stock are accepted, and the same thing with my submissions to Alamy and Shutterstock. So please, no lectures on quaity.

 

Gerry

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 19, 2021

The first (orange?) is underexposed and oversaturated. Even if I would consider this image as a pleasant and artistic one, the underexposure should be corrected.

The second has some noise and artefacts:

In addition, borders are razor sharp. And shadows are like black holes with no detail to recover.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
George_F
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 17, 2021

The odd texture in this one looks like oversharpening to me, and there is also some clipped parts of the main subject.  Histogram reflects the image is underexposed.  There also appears to be white spots on the fruit that should be removed before shooting or cloned out.

 

Parts of the main subject are underexposed, and the histogram indicates the image is underexposed.

 

The detail in the clipped areas wasn't able to be recovered no matter how much I adjusted exposure, at least in the jpeg you posted.

 

I hope that helps!

 

George F, Photographer & Forum Volunteer
Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Nancy OSheaCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
December 17, 2021

If I printed the first one, 90% would be black ink.  😥

The second image is too red.

 

 

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
Jill_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 17, 2021

Both are quite artistic, but I suppose the Moderator would judge them to be underexposed.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
Bugmugs2Author
Inspiring
December 21, 2021

Thank you, Jill! I'll keep that in mind.