Skip to main content
Worker404
Inspiring
June 30, 2024
Answered

things that should improve adobe stock

  • June 30, 2024
  • 7 replies
  • 2588 views

In my opinion, these are the most important modifications that must be made in Adobe Stock to make it much better. Before contesting the opinions, read them first and accept them. Certainly, you also suffer from problems and want solutions to them.

 

If you agree that you want amendments to these points as well, please add a vote for this post, or just copy it and try to suggest some of these ideas to the moderators if you are able to reach them, perhaps at least one point will be resolved.

--- --- --- --- --- --- ---

 

First, more customization for the portfolio: The Portfolio in Adobe needs more customization, and you must add at least two lines to describe yourself and the work that you do, or make it possible to display a way to communicate with you. The problem with this step is that Adobe will not want you to communicate with someone outside the site because it will lose the percentage of profit, so we move to the second point.

 

Secondly, it would be good to add the possibility of searching for images owned by a specific contrbutor, or searching for the contrbutor himself. Some people may prefer to buy specific businesses from a specific person, as in reality some buyers are more comfortable with merchants than other merchants. If the matter had been a failure, it would not have been implemented at sutterstock. This may increase the chance of people purchasing the content you produce. they can also add a button to follow specific contrbutors, so you get notifications when new assets come, It is not difficult.

 

Third, cookie issues: Some issues related to cookies must be resolved  which leads to your portfolio not appearing to you, but it appears to others normally.
The device on which you are logged in does not display your portfolio, but on other devices on which you are not logged in, it appears normally.

 

Fourth, the keyword tool: There is no doubt that the keywords provided by Adobe Stock are small when compared to those provided by shutterstock. You can notice the difference in the number of keywords and suggestions. The Adobe Stock team must work a little to improve the suggested keywords, and it would also be better Adding a tool that brings you images similar to your images and the keywords they contain, and you can choose the keywords that you like from them. The matter is applied in shutterstock and it is really successful. Man, imagine how much time you will save writing keywords and thinking about them.

 

Fifth: A comprehensive solution to the strange problems and complaints that appear regarding accepting images full of errors and rejecting good ones. We do not know the nature of the Adobe team’s view of the work and whether they examine all the images or judge all of them by some, but there is no doubt that the issue occurred to you or You are tired of the many posts complaining about the topic.

Correct answer Jill_C

Adobe's focus, and rightly so, is on making the BUYER's experience seamless and convenient and rewarding. If they don't continually improve Buyer satisfaction and convince more Buyers to engage in subscriptions, they will need far fewer Contributors. You have made suggestions to alter the Contributor experience without any considera of how it might affect Buyers.

 

I was going to write a detailed response to your suggestions, but you said "Before contesting the opinions, read them first and accept them", so it seems you aren't open to any other opinions. You also said "try to suggest some of these ideas to the moderators if you are able to reach them". That will never happened. I have been active on this forum for years now, and I have never heard of a single instance of anyone being in contact with a Moderator. Moderators do not make business or policy decisions on behalf of Adobe,

 

 

 

7 replies

Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Community Expert
August 7, 2025

1.  No need for this.  Adobe Portfolio already comes free with your Stock Contributor account.  It's highly customizable and connects seamlessly with your Stock Collections. And visitors can purchase Stock assets from links in your Portfolio. 

https://help.myportfolio.com/hc/articles/360036798993-Sharing-Adobe-Stock-Collections-on-Adobe-Portfolio

 

2. Customers search for content by keywords & phrases. They don't seek out specific Contributors unless they're doing something sketchy to artificially boost the seller's sales. Don't hold out any false hopes for that to change. 

 

3. Nobody can clear cookies & cached data from your browsers except YOU. Read the maker's documentation for details.  Cookies & Data Cache are usually under TOOLS ⇒ Settings ⇒ Privacy & Security. 

 

4. Keywords are fully customizable. Suggestions are there to help you get started. You're under no obligation to use them. Act according to your content, not the automated suggestions. 

 

5. Adobe doesn't think there's a problem with the Stock Review process. And you'll never convince them of it here. They don't interact with this user-to-user community. You know what to do.

https://contributor.stock.adobe.com/contact

 

Any other complaints? Take them directly to Adobe Stock. As product users, we are powerless to change how Adobe runs their business. Good luck.

 

 

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
Inspiring
July 1, 2024

The main page should contain a short description of 2-3 sentences. Next there should be a page with a more precise description. As far as I understand, they are removing this so that people do not contact us directly. However, I am sure they will come up with a complete portfolio and open contact information.

 

Collections. We only display 2 collections, I have 20 of them. Of course, they would clutter the main page. Therefore, collections must be displayed on a separate “Collections” tab.

 

Improved portfolio search - yes, yes, and yes again. I have a search bar, but it almost never works.

 

Keywords - I didn’t know that there could be much more of them, it seemed to me that there were so many. However, stock portfolios are becoming more and more complex and original with the advent of AI, I can see this in my portfolio. And standard words will clearly not be enough. Yes, I am for an increase of at least 50-100%.

 

Ratings. Some kind of ratings or just articles in a magazine that would help the buyer navigate this huge world of the portfolios. For example, “20 fashion photographers” or “20 ECO portfolios”, or “20 amazing pixel art artists”.

In principle, I would like to see more articles, you can make a good magazine on different topics, literally 7-10 materials per month will be enough to have comments, discussions and community.

 

Feedback - I heard that there is a problem with this. But I haven’t encountered it myself and I don’t know what’s wrong. Maybe they don’t answer only when they know for sure that you are a scammer? Maybe not. I don't have accurate information. When someone steals $100 from you, he is no longer your client, but a lawbreaker.

 

Cleaning of 6-fingered people 🙂 This has already happened! Thanks God. 

 

I really like Adobe’s articles about trends and what’s missing in a portfolio.

 

I really like to know how many views have my photos, not just sales.

 

This page is awesome https://contributor.stock.adobe.com/ru/insights/best/contributors. 

But right now there is an AI portfolio with huge errors that can be seen right 1 km away.

 

Inspiring
July 1, 2024

Absolutely agree and I can add 10 more things. But it feels like it goes how it goes. Thanks God, Adobe in general is super company. Anyway, I believe in 1-2 years we will see renovation of procces. 

By the way, everything is here also visible for Adobe Company, so doesnt matter that they not answer here, they read. 

Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Community Expert
June 30, 2024

1. This is a user-to-user community; not a direct pipeline to Adobe.

2. As non-employee Contributors, we have no say in how Adobe runs their business or their websites. That's not our wheelhouse.

3. If you get hired by Adobe, maybe they'll allow you to make recommendations to upper-level decision-makers.

 

Good luck.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
June 30, 2024
quote

Before contesting the opinions, read them first and accept them.


By @Worker404

No, I do not have to accept them. Why should I? You could expect that people read what you have to say before contesting, but they surely do not accept them.

quote

If you agree that you want amendments to these points as well, please add a vote for this post, or just copy it and try to suggest some of these ideas to the moderators if you are able to reach them, perhaps at least one point will be resolved.


By @Worker404

Upvoting your post does not make you earn a cent. Adobe does, for most of the posts, not read this forum. Sorry for that, but it is wasted effort. Nobody can reach out to the moderators except some employees of Adobe stock.

quote

First, more customization for the portfolio: The Portfolio in Adobe needs more customization, and you must add at least two lines to describe yourself and the work that you do, or make it possible to display a way to communicate with you. The problem with this step is that Adobe will not want you to communicate with someone outside the site because it will lose the percentage of profit, so we move to the second point.


By @Worker404

As you correctly pointed out, Adobe does not want that, so it is pointless. As for "describing your work": buyers are not searching by profile, but they are searching the whole database. Your individual profile is of no use to them. You can connect a collection of your profile with Portfolio, and you can share your public profile with social media as you wish. I don't do that. I do not feel a need to do that. And I do not need to feel the need for anyone in the world to know more about my life. When I'm taking pictures for a customer, I get paid by them. That's all. I can promote my work independently of Adobe stock. That's much more profitable for me.

quote

Secondly, it would be good to add the possibility of searching for images owned by a specific contrbutor, or searching for the contrbutor himself. Some people may prefer to buy specific businesses from a specific person, as in reality some buyers are more comfortable with merchants than other merchants. If the matter had been a failure, it would not have been implemented at sutterstock. This may increase the chance of people purchasing the content you produce. they can also add a button to follow specific contrbutors, so you get notifications when new assets come, It is not difficult.


By @Worker404

Again: customers do not search for your assets, they search for assets. When they find an asset that pleases them, there are tools to look for similar assets. That's much more profitable for you as a contributor and for Adobe. Using Shutterstock as an example of good sales is a joke. I do much more money and I have much more sales here on Adobe stock than I have on Shutterstock. So both, the amount and the numbers are more favourable for Adobe. And that even without all these whistles and bells. But it may be, that stock has the big advantage of being an integrated product to Creative Cloud. I agree, that advantage is unfair against the competition.

quote

Third, cookie issues: Some issues related to cookies must be resolved  which leads to your portfolio not appearing to you, but it appears to others normally.
The device on which you are logged in does not display your portfolio, but on other devices on which you are not logged in, it appears normally.


By @Worker404

That is more a region issue. In what region are you located? When I check my portfolio, it is the same as when other people look at my portfolio.

quote

Fourth, the keyword tool: There is no doubt that the keywords provided by Adobe Stock are small when compared to those provided by shutterstock. You can notice the difference in the number of keywords and suggestions. The Adobe Stock team must work a little to improve the suggested keywords, and it would also be better Adding a tool that brings you images similar to your images and the keywords they contain, and you can choose the keywords that you like from them. The matter is applied in shutterstock and it is really successful. Man, imagine how much time you will save writing keywords and thinking about them.


By @Worker404

Agree, the keyword tool could do a better job.

quote

Fifth: A comprehensive solution to the strange problems and complaints that appear regarding accepting images full of errors and rejecting good ones. We do not know the nature of the Adobe team’s view of the work and whether they examine all the images or judge all of them by some, but there is no doubt that the issue occurred to you or You are tired of the many posts complaining about the topic.


By @Worker404

No, the issue did not occur to me. But the issue surfaced when Adobe started accepting generative AI assets, and the moderators were not prepared for this. Most of the generative AI contributors throw anything against the wall, and see what sticks. It is rare that good assets get refused. I have seen here on the fora, during my years of presence may be three or four of such assets, where I simply could not explain, why the asset got refused. None of those was mine. My refusals are always for cause, even if I sometimes don't agree. I have some refusals for noise where I consider the noise level to be correct. But OK, I reduced the noise a little bit more and they passed. No harm done.

 

Generative AI assets that pass are very regularly scrap. I won't deny that. And I won't deny that contributors get confused with inconsistent refusals.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Known Participant
June 30, 2024

Dude 

I don't want to disappoint you, but you think that editing the noise of your rejected images is what led to your acceptance

I want to tell you that sometimes I have pictures that are rejected and I upload them again, but without editing them ,then they get accepted! And get sold!

 

because of that I think that a large part of the review process depends on the mood of the reviewer

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
June 30, 2024

Dude, you don't disappoint me, but submitting refused assets without further correction (and doing that systematically) will get you banned.

 

 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Instrumental
Inspiring
June 30, 2024
quote

First, more customization for the portfolio: The Portfolio in Adobe needs more customization, and you must add at least two lines to describe yourself and the work that you do, or make it possible to display a way to communicate with you. The problem with this step is that Adobe will not want you to communicate with someone outside the site because it will lose the percentage of profit, so we move to the second point.

 

 

By @Worker404

 

The whole paragraph is irrelevant, since there is Behance. Discover the network for yourself. There is an option to link your Adobe Stock acc there, and vice versa - you are able to link your Behance profile on Adobe Stock. And there are direct messages on Behance.

Worker404
Worker404Author
Inspiring
June 30, 2024

Thank you for the clarification, but there is much more than the platform I mentioned, there are other platforms

 

I also don't understand what you mean by irrelevant.

Jill_C
Community Expert
Jill_CCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
June 30, 2024

Adobe's focus, and rightly so, is on making the BUYER's experience seamless and convenient and rewarding. If they don't continually improve Buyer satisfaction and convince more Buyers to engage in subscriptions, they will need far fewer Contributors. You have made suggestions to alter the Contributor experience without any considera of how it might affect Buyers.

 

I was going to write a detailed response to your suggestions, but you said "Before contesting the opinions, read them first and accept them", so it seems you aren't open to any other opinions. You also said "try to suggest some of these ideas to the moderators if you are able to reach them". That will never happened. I have been active on this forum for years now, and I have never heard of a single instance of anyone being in contact with a Moderator. Moderators do not make business or policy decisions on behalf of Adobe,

 

 

 

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
Worker404
Worker404Author
Inspiring
June 30, 2024

I took some buyer criteria into account as well, adding a follow-up contributor might improve the buyer experience a bit, and also searching for a contributor could improve the buyer experience, some of these things are present at sutterstock and the platform is more successful.

 

I am happy for you to write a detailed comment on each point present as you wish. What I meant by challenging opinions is that I find that every point I write is criticized by some people in favor of Adobe, even though there are things that are taken for granted and are known to be problems, and solving them is better than leaving them, such as the problem of the disappearance of... portfolio. portfolio
I know that some people will find fault with every word I wrote and will not find at least a point that they find useful, even though they may be suffering from it. Some of them are desperate to defend the supervisors.

 

As you say, Adobe wants to improve the buyer experience, but it has neglected the contributor experience

 

You definitely agree with me that the experience of contributing to sutterstock is more comfortable, and perhaps even if the points you want are different, you want modifications that will facilitate your experience.

Instrumental
Inspiring
June 30, 2024
quote

the experience of contributing to sutterstock is more comfortable.


By @Worker404

 

Shutterstock is a trash because of their rates.