TRADEMARK Case Before US Supreme Court: Jack Daniels v Bad Spaniels (dog toy)

Forum|Forum|3 years ago
March 23, 2023
1 reply
210 views

The case pits the rights of a famous whisky trademark holder (Jack Daniels) against the First Amendment rights of a company that wants to use those marks to sell a "Bad Spaniels Silly Squeaker" dog toy that parodies the distiller's brand.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/21/politics/jack-daniels-bad-spaniels-dog-toy-supreme-court/index.html

I'll let you decide how this should play out.

Troubleshooting

This topic has been closed for replies.

Jill_C

Community Expert

Interesting. Indeed, justifying trademark infringement by claiming that it is merely a parody is a slippery slope...ending up in a smelly pile of poo.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

Nancy OShea

Author

Community Expert

Parody props are what Jimmy Kimmel's and Saturday Night Live's creative teams cook up. They use in a single segment of an episode. But they're not actually selling the parody props for profit. That's a whole other thing.

I can see why Jack Daniels doesn't want their brand associated with a line of dog toys, especially since they're not getting anything in return. It might have gone another way if VIP had reached out to JD before they launched the dog toy. But since they didn't, I think VIP's case is going to eat dog poo.

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Scanning file for viruses.

This file cannot be downloaded