Participant

Beantwortet

Undefined quality issues

Forum|Forum|3 years ago
August 22, 2023
9 Antworten
524 Ansichten

I use to think that Shutterstock had a higher bar to get images accepted. Now I leaning toward Adobe Stock. All 3 of these images were accepted by SS and rejected by Adobe Stock. I would appreciate any insights you have so I can improve my postprocessing.

Thanks, Rob

Dieses Thema wurde für Antworten geschlossen.

Beste Antwort von Jill_C

The first image has numerous lens spots in the sky.

In the second image the rocks are not in sharp focus, and it's a bit underexposed in the shadows.

Imthink the WB is a bit too blue in the 3rd image.

jacquelingphoto2017

Community Expert

Hi @robc92459028

All three files are underexposed. The first one has a white balance issue.

Best wishes

Jacquelin

RALPH_L

Community Expert

I feel that this is really a judgement call from the reviewer. Maybe the shadows on the first two are a little dark. The contrast and saturation on the last one are lacking a little. All three are a little soft. But, really, borderline.

robc92459028Autor

Participant

Thanks Ralph, I appreciate the help!

Rob

Jill_C

Antwort

Community Expert

The first image has numerous lens spots in the sky.

In the second image the rocks are not in sharp focus, and it's a bit underexposed in the shadows.

Imthink the WB is a bit too blue in the 3rd image.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

RALPH_L

Community Expert

Thanks @Jill_C , I hadnt noticed the spots. Now I see them too.

Abambo

Community Expert

Thanks @Jill_C , I hadnt noticed the spots. Now I see them too.

By @RALPH_L

Easy, when someone points them out, isn't it.

@robc92459028 ,

I would correct the spots and try that one again. I would also check the camera's sensor. Spots will always be against the sky (or a light uniform surface, like a white wall), especially in higher contrast images.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Anmelden

Login über soziales Netzwerk

Willkommen

Login über soziales Netzwerk